Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(ci): Add missing method parameter when sending Slack message #1545

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 29, 2024

Conversation

oskogstad
Copy link
Collaborator

@oskogstad oskogstad commented Nov 29, 2024

Missing required parameter after update to v2

@oskogstad oskogstad requested review from a team as code owners November 29, 2024 14:40
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 29, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the GitHub Actions workflow file responsible for sending CI/CD status messages to Slack. It introduces a new input parameter named method for the message-sending step, specifying the use of the chat.postMessage method for the Slack API. Additionally, the payload-file-path has been adjusted for consistency, although its content remains unchanged. The overall structure of the workflow, including jobs and steps, is preserved.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.github/workflows/workflow-send-ci-cd-status-slack-message.yml Added method parameter to jobs.send-slack-message step and updated payload-file-path position.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • knuhau

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f026333 and 8650132.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/workflow-send-ci-cd-status-slack-message.yml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.github/workflows/workflow-send-ci-cd-status-slack-message.yml (3)

91-94: Verify template compatibility with chat.postMessage method

The template at pipeline-failed.json should be compatible with the chat.postMessage method's expected payload structure.

✅ Verification successful

Template structure verified for chat.postMessage compatibility

The template at .github/slack-templates/pipeline-failed.json contains all the required fields (channel and either text or blocks) for the Slack chat.postMessage method, ensuring proper message delivery.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the template structure matches Slack's chat.postMessage requirements

# Check if template contains required fields for chat.postMessage
jq 'select(.channel != null and (.text != null or .blocks != null))' "./.github/slack-templates/pipeline-failed.json" > /dev/null
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
    echo "Template contains required fields"
else
    echo "Template missing required fields for chat.postMessage"
    exit 1
fi

Length of output: 212


94-94: Verify the pipeline-failed.json template exists

The payload-file-path value remains unchanged but let's ensure the template file exists and is properly formatted.

✅ Verification successful

Template file exists and is properly formatted

The pipeline-failed.json template exists at the specified path and contains valid JSON with the expected Slack message structure, including status indicators for various pipeline stages and a button to view the run details.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and format of the Slack message template

# Check if the template file exists
if [ -f "./.github/slack-templates/pipeline-failed.json" ]; then
    # Validate JSON format
    jq '.' "./.github/slack-templates/pipeline-failed.json"
else
    echo "Template file not found"
    exit 1
fi

Length of output: 1528


91-91: LGTM: Addition of required Slack API method parameter

The addition of method: chat.postMessage is correct and necessary for proper Slack API integration. This parameter explicitly specifies the Slack API method to use for message posting.

Let's verify the Slack API action version and method compatibility:

✅ Verification successful

The addition of method: chat.postMessage parameter is correct and necessary

Based on the documentation from Slack GitHub Action v2.0.0, the method parameter is now mandatory for Slack API integration. The PR's change aligns with the breaking changes introduced in v2.0.0 where "The Slack API method now must be specified in inputs" and chat.postMessage is the correct method for posting messages to channels.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify Slack GitHub Action version and documentation for method parameter

# Check the latest version and release notes
gh api repos/slackapi/slack-github-action/releases/latest --jq '.tag_name, .body'

# Search for method parameter documentation in README
curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/slackapi/slack-github-action/main/README.md | grep -A 5 -B 5 "method:"

Length of output: 25279


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@oskogstad oskogstad merged commit e4b5069 into main Nov 29, 2024
26 checks passed
@oskogstad oskogstad deleted the fix/add-missing-method-argument branch November 29, 2024 22:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants