Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: distinguish between awaiting Promise and waiting for subtask, simplify route rebuilding tasks #7203

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 29, 2024

Conversation

AlCalzone
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@AlCalzone
Copy link
Member Author

@zwave-js-bot automerge

@zwave-js-bot zwave-js-bot enabled auto-merge (squash) September 29, 2024 20:30
@zwave-js-bot zwave-js-bot merged commit d1ddbaf into master Sep 29, 2024
15 checks passed
@zwave-js-bot zwave-js-bot deleted the heal-task-improvements branch September 29, 2024 20:37
AlCalzone added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2024
This release adds an internal task scheduler that will allow more control over longer running tasks like device interviews, route rebuilding, firmware updates, etc. These improvements include pausing/resuming tasks, better prioritization for user-initiated actions, queueing tasks without interrupting ongoing ones, and more. Migration of existing features to the new scheduler will be done incrementally, starting with route rebuilding.

### Features
* Reworked route rebuilding to use the task scheduler. This enables rebuilding routes for multiple individual nodes at once. (#7196, #7203)

### Bugfixes
* Fixed a regression from `13.4.0` that prevented restoring NVM backups on 700/800 series controllers (#7220)

### Config file changes
* Add fingerprint to Aeotec ZWA024 (#7191)
* Correct max. value of SKU parameters for Kwikset locks (#7178)
* Add fingerprint to Remotec ZXT-800 (#7195)

### Changes under the hood
* Implement task scheduler (#7193)
* Upgrade to ESLint v9, typescript-eslint v8 (#6987)
* Update FAQ on secondary controllers (#7190)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants