Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Another attempt at adding explanations to resources #269

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 23, 2016
Merged

Another attempt at adding explanations to resources #269

merged 2 commits into from
Jun 23, 2016

Conversation

Mask
Copy link
Contributor

@Mask Mask commented Feb 26, 2016

I just merged the fork of @jramos #196 with the current master. The tests seem to all be fine.

This should cover #186.

@@ -369,6 +369,22 @@ resource "Orders" do
end
```

A resource can also have an example.
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A resource can also have an explanation

@h55nick
Copy link

h55nick commented May 31, 2016

this looks in good shape and is something I was looking to add as well! Thanks!

@oestrich
Copy link
Contributor

This looks good. Thanks!

@oestrich oestrich merged commit 595a8a3 into zipmark:master Jun 23, 2016
yachuntsai pushed a commit to iKala/apitome that referenced this pull request Jul 9, 2016
Support resource explanation rendering of rspec api documentation.
See more details in zipmark/rspec_api_documentation#269 .
yachuntsai pushed a commit to iKala/apitome that referenced this pull request Jul 10, 2016
Support resource explanation rendering of rspec api documentation.
See more details in zipmark/rspec_api_documentation#269 .
griley pushed a commit to tedconf/apitome that referenced this pull request Sep 7, 2016
DmitriyBaklikov pushed a commit to DmitriyBaklikov/apitome that referenced this pull request May 12, 2017
Support resource explanation rendering of rspec api documentation.
See more details in zipmark/rspec_api_documentation#269 .
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants