Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Leaner ZIOSpecWithKafka #588

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 17, 2023
Merged

Conversation

erikvanoosten
Copy link
Collaborator

@erikvanoosten erikvanoosten commented Jan 14, 2023

The new ZIOSpecWithKafka (from #528) is very useful for testing zio-kafka applications, however, it is extended with additional tools for naming which are not useful for everyone. Even so, it does force you to implement kafkaPrefix. This PR moves the naming extensions back to the zio-kafka-test module.

The new ZIOSpecWithKafka (from zio#528) is very useful for testing zio-kafka applications, however, it is extended with additional tools naming which are not useful for everyone. Even so, it does force you to implement `kafkaPrefix`.
This PR removes the naming extensions back to the zio-kafka-test module.
@erikvanoosten
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@tewecske You may want to review this PR since you proposed moving ZIOSpecWithKafka to zio-kafka-test-utils in #528.

@tewecske
Copy link
Contributor

@tewecske You may want to review this PR since you proposed moving ZIOSpecWithKafka to zio-kafka-test-utils in #528.

Sorry, I can't review it.
I agree that the abstract kafkaPrefix is not good like this in the utils but the random generators are somewhat useful I think.

@guizmaii guizmaii merged commit ff55555 into zio:master Jan 17, 2023
@erikvanoosten erikvanoosten deleted the leanerziospecwithkafka branch February 1, 2023 15:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants