Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Broaden Authorizations from SpendDescriptionV5::into_spend_description #143

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 24, 2024

Conversation

str4d
Copy link
Contributor

@str4d str4d commented Oct 12, 2024

This enables the method to be used with bundles that have spend auth signatures and proofs, but not yet binding signatures.

@@ -298,12 +298,15 @@ impl SpendDescriptionV5 {
Self { cv, nullifier, rk }
}

pub fn into_spend_description(
pub fn into_spend_description<A>(
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This feels like it should be backwards-compatible, but I'll check with cargo semver-checks.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

#144 is not backwards-compatible, and that's the API change I actually needed, so I'm just going to deploy this at the same time.

Copy link
Contributor

@nuttycom nuttycom left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

…tion`

This enables the method to be used with bundles that have spend auth
signatures and proofs, but not yet binding signatures.
@str4d str4d force-pushed the generalise-spend-desc-conversion branch from dd0a91a to 6527e79 Compare October 24, 2024 04:37
@str4d
Copy link
Contributor Author

str4d commented Oct 24, 2024

Rebased on main to fix merge conflict.

@str4d str4d merged commit 44c4b17 into main Oct 24, 2024
23 checks passed
@str4d str4d deleted the generalise-spend-desc-conversion branch October 24, 2024 05:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants