-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 20
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Provided access to human split-out data. #296
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you expand on why the path fallback check is needed? As this is in the base class the behaviour will be inherited broadly, including by legacy genotype code, which could be given incorrent permissions as a result.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As far as I understand, there is an intention to create and store in iRODS split-out human data, which will or might originate from outside of the main NPG Illumina pipeline. This data might not belong to Illumina platform. The requirement for this task was to provide this scpecial level of access to files with names containing the
_human
string. There is not firm agreement at the moment that fies like this will have thealignment_filter
metadata set. Therefore, the code covers both eventualities.As far as I understand, the requirement is to inherit the behaviour broadly. Personally, I prefer the version of this implementation in #297 and a sibling wtsi-npg/npg_irods#439. It ishould also be possible, though I have not tried this, to move the
expected_groups
method as it is in #297 to thenpg_irods
package if it has a seq platform independent part.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'll mark this as approved, but this change must not break https://github.com/wtsi-npg/genotyping which also depends on this package.