-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CWT contest - DxStation should send 'R' after user's exchange is sent #175
Comments
Hi Mike,
I may have confused you a bit. Let me try to clear this up!!
What is currently happening in 1.82 in CWT contest:
CWT op A calls cq
B replies with B's call, name, op # (or whatever)
A replies with A's call, name, op # (or whatever)
What should happen is:
CWT op A calls cq
B replies with B's call
A replies with B's call, A's name, op # (or whatever)
B replies with B's name, op # (or whatever)
There is never an 'R' in CWT contest.
We do need the 'R' in CW WPX
after the 'correct call' is entered by B, or after the 'correct call' is
entered by B and after A sends NR? or AGN
Sorry for the confusion and I hope this helps.
73,
Bob WR7Q
CWA Admin
…On Sat, Feb 4, 2023 at 12:31 AM Mike Brashler ***@***.***> wrote:
Description
In the CWops CWT Contest, when the DxStation responds to user's initial
callback and exchange, the 'R' (exchange received) is not sent. Instead the
calling station immediately sends its exchange (Name NR). This does not
follow usual operating protocol. This was noted by Bob, @WR7Q
<https://github.com/WR7Q>, in our discussion (see #174
<#174>).
Steps To Reproduce
1. CWT Contest
2. Start Single Calls
3. Answer the station calling by entering their callsign.
4. Observe their response does not contain an acknowledgement ('R')
that they correctly copied the exchange.
Expected behavior
The calling station should respond with an 'R' to indicate they received
my exchange.
Actual Behavior
The 'R' acknowledgement is missing. The station immediately starts sending
their Name and Number/State/Province.
Reproduces how often
Always
Version information
- Morse Runner version: 1.82
Additional context
In discussions with Bob, he states they teach their CWT students to not
send a report until the other station acknowledges receipt of exchange with
an 'R'. This is also proper contest behavior.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#175>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ANIHTM2NMDDKTYTBZQ257ODWVYAUVANCNFSM6AAAAAAURATHCI>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Bob, I think you are saying you disagree with this change to add the R in the response from caller B receives the report. In other words, the original CWT implementation (I.e. version 1.82) behavior was correct. |
@ct7aup David, do you have an opinion on this one? |
It seems really odd that a contest operator would not use an R to acknowledge receipt of the prior transmission. Are you saying that in CWT contest the R is never used? |
Yes, this is a different kind of contest. Some times it is used along with
other items like, '73', 'tnx Bob', etc. But I would suggest you leave it
out of MR most of the time.
You or someone may want to listen one of the Wednesdays of you have time.
73 Bob WR7Q
…On Sun, Feb 5, 2023, 23:45 Mike Brashler ***@***.***> wrote:
It seems really odd that a contest operator would not use an R to
acknowledge receipt of the prior transmission. Are you saying that in CWT
contest the R is never used?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#175 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ANIHTM6RN5PMYEIU3HJIDZ3WWCMXZANCNFSM6AAAAAAURATHCI>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Usual contest behavior is to send NAME/NR without a leading acknowledgement. After additional discussion, we want to preserve original behavior. Now, the 'R' acknowledgement is only sent 10% of the time. Fixes #175.
Description
In the CWops CWT Contest, when the DxStation responds to user's initial callback and exchange, the 'R' (exchange received) is not sent. Instead the calling station immediately sends its exchange (Name NR). This does not follow usual operating protocol. This was noted by Bob, @WR7Q, in our discussion (see #174).
Steps To Reproduce
Expected behavior
The calling station should respond with an 'R' to indicate they received my exchange.
Actual Behavior
The 'R' acknowledgement is missing. The station immediately starts sending their Name and Number/State/Province.
Reproduces how often
Always
Version information
Additional context
In discussions with Bob, he states they teach their CWT students to not send a report until the other station acknowledges receipt of exchange with an 'R'. This is also proper contest behavior.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: