Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Editorial: use associated Document in place of responsible document #182

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 25, 2022
Merged

Editorial: use associated Document in place of responsible document #182

merged 3 commits into from
May 25, 2022

Conversation

miketaylr
Copy link
Member

@miketaylr miketaylr commented Mar 12, 2022 •
edited by pr-preview bot
Loading

jgraham
jgraham approved these changes May 25, 2022
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@jgraham jgraham left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wonder if we should check whether associated Document exists on settings before accessing it, but hopefully it's clear.

@jgraham jgraham merged commit 2ea6809 into w3c:master May 25, 2022
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request May 25, 2022
@miketaylr @github-actions
Editorial: use associated Document in place of responsible document (#…
609269b 
…182)

SHA: 2ea6809
Reason: push, by @jgraham

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@miketaylr
Copy link
Member Author

hopefully it's clear.

famous last words.

@miketaylr miketaylr deleted the remove-responsible-doc branch May 25, 2022 17:21
@jgraham jgraham mentioned this pull request May 31, 2022
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@jgraham jgraham jgraham approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@miketaylr @jgraham