Skip to content

Issues: w3c/wcag-act

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

73 Open 276 Closed
73 Open 276 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

Should ACT require the formats for rules to be localizable? i18n-needs-resolution Issue the Internationalization Group has raised and looks for a response on.
#575 opened Oct 17, 2024 by bert-github
1
Is the ‘descriptive title’ used for matching? i18n-needs-resolution Issue the Internationalization Group has raised and looks for a response on.
#574 opened Oct 17, 2024 by bert-github
1
ACT does not require that the language of text is indicated i18n-needs-resolution Issue the Internationalization Group has raised and looks for a response on.
#573 opened Oct 17, 2024 by bert-github
1
How are rule identifiers matched to one another? i18n-needs-resolution Issue the Internationalization Group has raised and looks for a response on.
#572 opened Oct 17, 2024 by bert-github
1
Require that examples of composed rules are consistent with the conformance requirements
#567 opened Aug 1, 2024 by WilcoFiers
Wide Review Tracker
#566 opened Jul 24, 2024 by daniel-montalvo
13 tasks
@daniel-montalvo
Example numbering is confusing editorial
#563 opened Jul 18, 2024 by daniel-montalvo
@daniel-montalvo
Accessibility requirements, conformance requirements, and secondary requirements definitions rules format 1.1
#551 opened Nov 17, 2023 by daniel-montalvo
Allowing parametric rules rules format 1.1
#549 opened Oct 19, 2023 by Jym77
3
Invalid w3c.json data
#544 opened Sep 13, 2023 by dontcallmedom-bot
1 task
Invalid w3c.json data
#543 opened Sep 13, 2023 by dontcallmedom-bot
1 task
Question: Is there a representation of ACT rules available for consumption in JSON-LD?
#536 opened Dec 13, 2022 by rvantonisse
Should Exceptions allow Alternatives? rules format 1.1
#535 opened Sep 13, 2022 by WilcoFiers
ACT 1.1 Backward Compatibility with ACT 1.0 rules format 1.1
#534 opened Sep 8, 2022 by tbostic32
Consider better scoping for Outcome Mapping section of the rules format rules format 1.1
#532 opened Jul 21, 2022 by tombrunet
Consider new term for 'input aspects' rules format 1.1
#530 opened May 31, 2022 by mbgower
Consider renaming Test cases to Examples in 1.1 rules format 1.1
#529 opened May 10, 2022 by WilcoFiers
Ways to allow others to provide feedback on the rules
#525 opened Jan 11, 2022 by WilcoFiers
Better organize the All ACT rules page
#519 opened Apr 12, 2021 by WilcoFiers
Add paragraph to About ACT rules on "proposed rules"
#518 opened Apr 12, 2021 by WilcoFiers
Remove acknowledgements on About ACT rules
#517 opened Apr 12, 2021 by WilcoFiers
Resolve "headers attribute specified on a cell refers to cells in the same table element" feedback
#513 opened Mar 16, 2021 by kengdoj
12 tasks
ACT rules and machine learning for future consideration
#512 opened Mar 5, 2021 by WilcoFiers
Understanding Prerequisites for Test Rules
#511 opened Feb 25, 2021 by lwolberg
1
Resolve "Heading has non-empty accessible name" ready for survey
#510 opened Feb 15, 2021 by nitedog
6 tasks
1
ProTip! Type g p on any issue or pull request to go back to the pull request listing page.