Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ensure sufficient guidance regarding impact of roles on semantics associated with elements #474

Closed
joanmarie opened this issue Oct 11, 2017 · 3 comments
Labels
Practice Page Related to a page within the practices section of the APG

Comments

@joanmarie
Copy link

Some concrete examples and related discussions/concerns:

The solution which strikes me as the best way to ensure interoperability as well as buy-in from user agent and screen reader implementors is to ensure authors don't apply roles to elements with associated semantics and screen reader presentation/navigation. In other words, as Matt had suggested in his on-list response:

If an author wants to make a log table use <div role="log"><table></table></log>.

Seems like a job for Authoring Practices. 😄

@mcking65 mcking65 added documentation Practice Page Related to a page within the practices section of the APG labels Oct 11, 2017
@mcking65 mcking65 added this to the 3Q17 Working Draft milestone Oct 11, 2017
@mcking65
Copy link
Contributor

I have been planning on adding an introductory section that could some of the most important fundamentals/dangers of ARIA ... I will accelerate in response to this need.

mcking65 added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 15, 2017
Forissue #474, modified aria-practices.html to add a read me first section.
This includes  some aria basics, a browser and AT compatibility statement, and a mobile and touch support statement.
mcking65 added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 15, 2017
For issue #474, modified aria-practices.html to make editorial improvements to the new read me first section.
@mcking65
Copy link
Contributor

@joanmarie, @jcsteh, @MarcoZehe,

Today I added a proposed draft of a new
Read Me First
section to APG. I am curious to know if it adequately addresses concerns expressed in
Mozilla bug 1407287.

@mcking65
Copy link
Contributor

Work on this is complete and has been reviewed in issue 482. If the resolution is not adequate, please feel free to reopen.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Practice Page Related to a page within the practices section of the APG
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants