Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merge release/v0.25.1 to develop #4722

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 24, 2024
Merged

Merge release/v0.25.1 to develop #4722

merged 2 commits into from
Aug 24, 2024

Conversation

voxel51-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@voxel51-bot voxel51-bot commented Aug 23, 2024

Merge release/v0.25.1 to develop

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved the clarity and efficiency of the tracking ID extraction process, ensuring consistent output without unnecessary computations.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 23, 2024

Walkthrough

The code modification simplifies the generation of a list of None values in the _extract_track_ids function based on the result.boxes.is_track condition. The change involves removing an unnecessary call to len() on an integer, resulting in a more straightforward expression.

Changes

Files Change Summary
fiftyone/utils/ultralytics.py Simplified the expression for generating a list of None values in _extract_track_ids by removing an unnecessary len() call.

Poem

In the code where rabbits hop,
A change was made, a little swap.
No more len() to trip and fall,
Just clearer paths for one and all.
Hoppy days for code so bright,
With simpler steps, we take our flight! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1749abe and e697561.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • fiftyone/utils/ultralytics.py (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • fiftyone/utils/ultralytics.py

Copy link
Contributor

@swheaton swheaton left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

oh thank you voxelbot

@swheaton swheaton merged commit 76cdadf into develop Aug 24, 2024
13 checks passed
@swheaton swheaton deleted the merge/release/v0.25.1 branch August 24, 2024 02:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants