Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release-21.0] fix issue with json unmarshalling of operators with space in them #16933

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 13, 2024

Conversation

systay
Copy link
Collaborator

@systay systay commented Oct 11, 2024

This is a backport of #16905

Description

In a PR merged earlier today, I accidentally failed to consider binary operators that have spaces in them, such as not like and not in. This is a fix for that oversight.

Related Issue(s)

#16892

Checklist

  • "Backport to:" labels have been added if this change should be back-ported to release branches
  • If this change is to be back-ported to previous releases, a justification is included in the PR description
  • Tests were added or are not required
  • Did the new or modified tests pass consistently locally and on CI?
  • Documentation was added or is not required

Copy link
Contributor

vitess-bot bot commented Oct 11, 2024

Review Checklist

Hello reviewers! 👋 Please follow this checklist when reviewing this Pull Request.

General

  • Ensure that the Pull Request has a descriptive title.
  • Ensure there is a link to an issue (except for internal cleanup and flaky test fixes), new features should have an RFC that documents use cases and test cases.

Tests

  • Bug fixes should have at least one unit or end-to-end test, enhancement and new features should have a sufficient number of tests.

Documentation

  • Apply the release notes (needs details) label if users need to know about this change.
  • New features should be documented.
  • There should be some code comments as to why things are implemented the way they are.
  • There should be a comment at the top of each new or modified test to explain what the test does.

New flags

  • Is this flag really necessary?
  • Flag names must be clear and intuitive, use dashes (-), and have a clear help text.

If a workflow is added or modified:

  • Each item in Jobs should be named in order to mark it as required.
  • If the workflow needs to be marked as required, the maintainer team must be notified.

Backward compatibility

  • Protobuf changes should be wire-compatible.
  • Changes to _vt tables and RPCs need to be backward compatible.
  • RPC changes should be compatible with vitess-operator
  • If a flag is removed, then it should also be removed from vitess-operator and arewefastyet, if used there.
  • vtctl command output order should be stable and awk-able.

@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v21.0.0 milestone Oct 11, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 11, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 57.14286% with 15 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Please upload report for BASE (release-21.0@1634894). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
go/vt/sqlparser/ast_funcs.go 33.33% 10 Missing ⚠️
go/vt/vtgate/planbuilder/operators/keys.go 75.00% 5 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##             release-21.0   #16933   +/-   ##
===============================================
  Coverage                ?   69.41%           
===============================================
  Files                   ?     1570           
  Lines                   ?   203812           
  Branches                ?        0           
===============================================
  Hits                    ?   141484           
  Misses                  ?    62328           
  Partials                ?        0           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@rohit-nayak-ps rohit-nayak-ps merged commit 8b68021 into vitessio:release-21.0 Oct 13, 2024
102 of 103 checks passed
@rohit-nayak-ps rohit-nayak-ps deleted the backport-16905 branch October 13, 2024 10:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants