refactor dockerfiles and update gitattributes #2743
Conversation
Signed-off-by: kpango <[email protected]>
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes in this pull request primarily involve updates to the Changes
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Warning Rate limit exceeded@kpango has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 6 minutes and 34 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
kpango
requested review from
a team,
kmrmt and
datelier
and removed request for
a team
|
[CHATOPS:HELP] ChatOps commands.
|
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (10)
hack/git/hooks/pre-commit (1)
Line range hint
18-40: Consider moving renormalization outside the Go files check.The renormalization command is currently only executed when Go files are changed. Consider moving it outside the if block to ensure all staged files get normalized regardless of their type.
if git diff HEAD^ --name-only | grep ".go$" > /dev/null; then cp go.mod ${TMPDIR} cp go.sum ${TMPDIR} # format go code make format/go make format/go/test # go build echo "Run go build..." go build -mod=readonly ./... echo "go build finished." if [ `git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD` = "main" ]; then # golangci-lint echo "Run golangci-lint..." make go/lint echo "golangci-lint finished." fi mv -f ${TMPDIR}/go.mod . mv -f ${TMPDIR}/go.sum . - git diff --cached --name-only | xargs -r git add --renormalize fi + +# Ensure consistent file encodings for all staged files +git diff --cached --name-only | xargs -r git add --renormalizedockers/index/job/save/Dockerfile (1)
Line range hint
1-89: Excellent Dockerfile structure and practices!The Dockerfile demonstrates several best practices:
- Efficient caching strategy using mount caches for apt and Go builds
- Security-focused configuration with distroless base image and nonroot user
- Clear multi-stage build pattern reducing final image size
Consider documenting these practices in a central location to ensure consistency across all Dockerfiles in the project.
dockers/tools/benchmark/operator/Dockerfile (2)
Line range hint
38-45: Excellent build optimization with mount caching!The RUN command has been optimized with several mount options that provide significant benefits:
- Proper caching of apt packages and Go build artifacts
- Temporary storage using tmpfs
- Locked sharing for concurrent builds
- Architecture-specific caching with
${TARGETARCH}This will improve build performance and reproducibility.
Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of each mount for better maintainability.
Line range hint
46-71: Consider organizing package installations for better readability.The package installation commands follow good practices but could be more organized.
Consider grouping related packages:
&& apt-get install -y --no-install-recommends --fix-missing \ - build-essential \ - ca-certificates \ - curl \ - tzdata \ - locales \ - git \ + # Build tools + build-essential \ + git \ + # System requirements + ca-certificates \ + curl \ + # Localization + tzdata \ + locales \dockers/index/job/deletion/Dockerfile (2)
1-2: LGTM! Enhanced error checking is a good practice.The addition of
# check=error=truedirective will help catch build issues early by enabling strict error checking during the build process.This enhancement aligns with best practices for container builds by failing fast when issues are detected.
Line range hint
3-89: Consider additional build optimizations while maintaining current best practices.The current implementation already includes several good practices:
- Using BuildKit mounts for efficient caching
- Proper locale and timezone setup
- Security-focused configuration with non-root user
- Distroless base image
However, consider these potential optimizations:
RUN --mount=type=bind,target=.,rw \ --mount=type=tmpfs,target=/tmp \ --mount=type=cache,target=/var/lib/apt,sharing=locked,id=${APP_NAME} \ --mount=type=cache,target=/var/cache/apt,sharing=locked,id=${APP_NAME} \ --mount=type=cache,target="${GOPATH}/pkg",id="go-build-${TARGETARCH}" \ --mount=type=cache,target="${HOME}/.cache/go-build",id="go-build-${TARGETARCH}" \ --mount=type=tmpfs,target="${GOPATH}/src" \ set -ex \ && echo 'Binary::apt::APT::Keep-Downloaded-Packages "true";' > /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/keep-cache \ && echo 'APT::Install-Recommends "false";' > /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/no-install-recommends \ && apt-get clean \ && apt-get update -y \ - && apt-get upgrade -y \ && apt-get install -y --no-install-recommends --fix-missing \ + && apt-get install -y --no-install-recommends --fix-missing --no-upgrade \ build-essential \ ca-certificates \ curl \ tzdata \ locales \ git \ + && rm -rf /var/lib/apt/lists/* \ && ldconfig \These changes would:
- Remove the full upgrade step which isn't necessary for a build container
- Add explicit --no-upgrade flag to apt-get install
- Clean up apt lists to reduce image size
dockers/index/job/correction/Dockerfile (1)
Line range hint
30-40: LGTM! Excellent cache configuration, with a minor readability suggestion.The mount configurations are well structured with proper cache sharing and locking:
- Apt cache is properly shared and locked
- Go build cache is architecture-specific
- Temporary mounts use tmpfs for better performance
Consider grouping related mount options for better readability:
RUN --mount=type=bind,target=.,rw \ --mount=type=tmpfs,target=/tmp \ + --mount=type=tmpfs,target="${GOPATH}/src" \ # APT caches --mount=type=cache,target=/var/lib/apt,sharing=locked,id=${APP_NAME} \ --mount=type=cache,target=/var/cache/apt,sharing=locked,id=${APP_NAME} \ + # Go build caches --mount=type=cache,target="${GOPATH}/pkg",id="go-build-${TARGETARCH}" \ --mount=type=cache,target="${HOME}/.cache/go-build",id="go-build-${TARGETARCH}" \ - --mount=type=tmpfs,target="${GOPATH}/src" \dockers/tools/benchmark/job/Dockerfile (2)
Line range hint
45-52: Excellent use of BuildKit mount optionsThe addition of various mount types optimizes the build process:
- Bind mount for source code
- Tmpfs for temporary files
- Cache mounts for apt packages and Go build artifacts
- Proper cache sharing configuration with architecture-specific IDs
This will significantly improve build performance and reduce disk I/O.
Line range hint
53-86: Consider splitting the RUN command for better maintainabilityWhile the current implementation is functionally correct, the RUN command is quite long and handles multiple concerns. Consider splitting it into logical groups:
- System package installation
- Locale and timezone setup
- Go installation and build
Example refactor:
-RUN --mount=type=bind,target=.,rw \ +# System dependencies +RUN --mount=type=cache,target=/var/lib/apt,sharing=locked,id=${APP_NAME} \ + --mount=type=cache,target=/var/cache/apt,sharing=locked,id=${APP_NAME} \ + set -ex \ + && echo 'Binary::apt::APT::Keep-Downloaded-Packages "true";' > /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/keep-cache \ + && echo 'APT::Install-Recommends "false";' > /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/no-install-recommends \ + && apt-get update -y \ + && apt-get install -y --no-install-recommends build-essential ca-certificates curl tzdata locales git cmake g++ gcc libssl-dev unzip libhdf5-dev libaec-dev + +# Locale and timezone +RUN set -ex \ + && echo "${LANG} UTF-8" > /etc/locale.gen \ + && ln -fs /usr/share/zoneinfo/${TZ} /etc/localtime \ + && locale-gen ${LANGUAGE} \ + && update-locale LANG=${LANGUAGE} \ + && dpkg-reconfigure -f noninteractive tzdata + +# Build application +RUN --mount=type=bind,target=.,rw \ --mount=type=tmpfs,target=/tmp \ - --mount=type=cache,target=/var/lib/apt,sharing=locked,id=${APP_NAME} \ - --mount=type=cache,target=/var/cache/apt,sharing=locked,id=${APP_NAME} \ --mount=type=cache,target="${GOPATH}/pkg",id="go-build-${TARGETARCH}" \ --mount=type=cache,target="${HOME}/.cache/go-build",id="go-build-${TARGETARCH}" \ - --mount=type=tmpfs,target="${GOPATH}/src" \ - && echo 'Binary::apt::APT::Keep-Downloaded-Packages "true";' > /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/keep-cache \ - ...rest of the command...dockers/operator/helm/Dockerfile (1)
Line range hint
57-95: Consider adding inline comments for complex mount options.While the RUN command is well-structured with optimized caching strategies, it would benefit from inline documentation explaining the purpose of each mount type and cache configuration.
Example documentation to add:
RUN --mount=type=bind,target=.,rw \ + # Use tmpfs for temporary files to speed up builds --mount=type=tmpfs,target=/tmp \ + # Cache apt packages to speed up subsequent builds --mount=type=cache,target=/var/lib/apt,sharing=locked,id=${APP_NAME} \
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
hack/docker/gen/main.gois excluded by!**/gen/**
📒 Files selected for processing (28)
.gitattributes(1 hunks)dockers/agent/core/agent/Dockerfile(2 hunks)dockers/agent/core/faiss/Dockerfile(2 hunks)dockers/agent/core/ngt/Dockerfile(2 hunks)dockers/agent/sidecar/Dockerfile(2 hunks)dockers/binfmt/Dockerfile(2 hunks)dockers/buildbase/Dockerfile(2 hunks)dockers/buildkit/Dockerfile(2 hunks)dockers/buildkit/syft/scanner/Dockerfile(2 hunks)dockers/ci/base/Dockerfile(2 hunks)dockers/dev/Dockerfile(2 hunks)dockers/discoverer/k8s/Dockerfile(2 hunks)dockers/example/client/Dockerfile(2 hunks)dockers/gateway/filter/Dockerfile(2 hunks)dockers/gateway/lb/Dockerfile(2 hunks)dockers/gateway/mirror/Dockerfile(2 hunks)dockers/index/job/correction/Dockerfile(2 hunks)dockers/index/job/creation/Dockerfile(2 hunks)dockers/index/job/deletion/Dockerfile(2 hunks)dockers/index/job/readreplica/rotate/Dockerfile(2 hunks)dockers/index/job/save/Dockerfile(2 hunks)dockers/index/operator/Dockerfile(2 hunks)dockers/manager/index/Dockerfile(2 hunks)dockers/operator/helm/Dockerfile(2 hunks)dockers/tools/benchmark/job/Dockerfile(2 hunks)dockers/tools/benchmark/operator/Dockerfile(2 hunks)dockers/tools/cli/loadtest/Dockerfile(2 hunks)hack/git/hooks/pre-commit(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (18)
- dockers/agent/core/agent/Dockerfile
- dockers/agent/core/faiss/Dockerfile
- dockers/agent/sidecar/Dockerfile
- dockers/binfmt/Dockerfile
- dockers/buildbase/Dockerfile
- dockers/buildkit/Dockerfile
- dockers/buildkit/syft/scanner/Dockerfile
- dockers/ci/base/Dockerfile
- dockers/dev/Dockerfile
- dockers/discoverer/k8s/Dockerfile
- dockers/example/client/Dockerfile
- dockers/gateway/filter/Dockerfile
- dockers/gateway/lb/Dockerfile
- dockers/gateway/mirror/Dockerfile
- dockers/index/job/readreplica/rotate/Dockerfile
- dockers/index/operator/Dockerfile
- dockers/manager/index/Dockerfile
- dockers/tools/cli/loadtest/Dockerfile
🔇 Additional comments (24)
hack/git/hooks/pre-commit (1)
40-40: LGTM! Good addition of git renormalization.
The addition of git add --renormalize helps ensure consistent file encodings and line endings across different environments, which is especially important for a cross-platform project.
.gitattributes (3)
18-36: Well-structured text file configurations
The text file configurations are comprehensive and follow best practices:
- Consistent encoding and line ending settings
- Appropriate diff drivers for language-specific files
- Clear linguist language hints where needed
57-57: LGTM: Proper vendor directory configuration
Correctly marks vendor directory as vendored code for GitHub language statistics.
59-64: LGTM: Comprehensive export ignore configurations
The export ignore configurations properly exclude all common temporary and system-specific files.
dockers/index/job/save/Dockerfile (2)
89-89: LGTM! ENTRYPOINT configuration is correct.
The ENTRYPOINT is properly configured using:
- Exec form syntax
[]which is recommended over shell form - Correct binary path that matches the COPY instruction
- Runs after setting nonroot user for security
2-2: LGTM! Verify consistency across other Dockerfiles.
The addition of # check=error=true is a good practice as it enables stricter error checking during the build process.
Let's verify if this directive is consistently applied across other Dockerfiles:
✅ Verification successful
The check=error=true directive is consistently applied across all Dockerfiles
The verification shows that all Dockerfiles in the repository have the # check=error=true directive properly set in their headers, demonstrating consistent application of this best practice across the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistency of error checking directive across Dockerfiles
# Expected: All Dockerfiles should have the same error checking directive
# Search for Dockerfiles and check for the presence of check=error directive
fd Dockerfile$ | while read -r file; do
echo "=== $file ==="
head -n 3 "$file" | grep -E "^#\s*check=error"
done
Length of output: 5327
dockers/tools/benchmark/operator/Dockerfile (3)
Line range hint 83-89: LGTM! Follows security best practices.
The final stage implements several security best practices:
- Uses minimal distroless base image
- Runs as nonroot user
- Contains only necessary artifacts
Line range hint 1-89: Verify consistency across all Dockerfiles.
Let's ensure these improvements are consistently applied across all Dockerfiles in the project.
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check consistency of Dockerfile configurations
# Expect: All Dockerfiles should follow similar patterns
# Check for key elements across all Dockerfiles
fd Dockerfile$ | while read -r file; do
echo "=== Checking $file ==="
echo "1. Error checking:"
grep "check=error=true" "$file" || echo "Missing error checking"
echo "2. Mount caching:"
grep "mount=type=cache" "$file" || echo "Missing cache mounts"
echo "3. Security:"
grep "nonroot:nonroot" "$file" || echo "Missing nonroot user"
echo "4. Base images:"
grep "FROM gcr.io/distroless" "$file" || echo "Not using distroless"
echo "---"
done1-2: LGTM! Enhanced error checking enabled.
The addition of check=error=true directive improves build reliability by enabling stricter error checking during the build process.
✅ Verification successful
LGTM! Error checking directive is consistently applied across all Dockerfiles
The verification confirms that the check=error=true directive has been uniformly applied across all Dockerfiles in the repository, which is a good practice for maintaining consistent build reliability.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify consistent error checking across all Dockerfiles
# Expect: All Dockerfiles should have the same error checking directive
# Check if all Dockerfiles have the error checking directive
fd Dockerfile$ | while read -r file; do
echo "Checking $file:"
grep -A 1 "syntax = docker/dockerfile:latest" "$file"
done
Length of output: 23606
dockers/index/job/creation/Dockerfile (4)
2-2: LGTM! Good addition of strict error checking.
The check=error=true directive enables strict error checking during the Docker build process, which helps catch potential issues early in the build pipeline.
89-89: LGTM! Proper ENTRYPOINT configuration.
The ENTRYPOINT is correctly configured using exec form and points to the copied binary.
Line range hint 85-87: LGTM! Secure configuration using distroless and nonroot user.
The final stage follows security best practices with minimal attack surface.
Let's verify the sample config file exists and is consistent:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify sample config file existence and contents
# Expect: The sample.yaml file should exist and contain valid configuration
# Check if the sample config file exists
fd -t f "sample.yaml" cmd/index/job/creation/
# If found, verify it's a valid YAML file
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
cat cmd/index/job/creation/sample.yaml | grep -v '^#' | grep .
fiLine range hint 44-48: LGTM! Excellent use of BuildKit mount options for optimization.
The mount configuration follows best practices:
- Bind mount for source code
- Tmpfs for temporary directories
- Shared caches for apt and go build with proper locking
Let's verify the cache mount paths are consistent across other Dockerfiles:
✅ Verification successful
The previous search didn't yield the expected results. Let's try with a broader search pattern to find cache mount configurations in Dockerfiles.
Let's try with a more basic approach using find and grep to locate the mount configurations in Dockerfiles.
We've confirmed the apt cache mounts are consistent across all Dockerfiles. Let's also check for Go-specific cache mounts to ensure complete verification of build caches.
Cache mount configurations are consistent across Dockerfiles
The verification shows that all Dockerfiles consistently use the same cache mount configuration:
- Bind mount for source code with
target=.,rw - Tmpfs mount for temporary files with
target=/tmp - Apt cache mounts with proper locking:
/var/lib/aptand/var/cache/aptwithsharing=lockedandid=${APP_NAME}
The cache paths and sharing configuration are uniform across all instances, ensuring optimal build caching behavior.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check cache mount paths consistency across Dockerfiles
# Expect: Similar cache mount configurations in other Dockerfiles
rg --type dockerfile 'type=cache,target=' dockers/
Length of output: 5616
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try again with the correct path and search pattern
rg --type dockerfile -A 3 'RUN.*--mount=type=cache' dockers/
Length of output: 97
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for RUN commands with mount options in all Dockerfile files
find dockers -type f -name "Dockerfile" -exec grep -A 3 "RUN.*--mount" {} \;
Length of output: 5029
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's also check for Go-specific cache mounts since this is a Go project
find dockers -type f -name "Dockerfile" -exec grep -A 3 "type=cache,target=/go" {} \;
Length of output: 86
dockers/index/job/deletion/Dockerfile (1)
88-88: Verify the existence and validity of the configuration file.
The Dockerfile copies cmd/index/job/deletion/sample.yaml into the container. Let's ensure this file exists and contains valid configuration.
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify the actual configuration file being copied in the Dockerfile.
Let me check if the file exists at the correct source path and examine its contents.
Configuration file exists and is properly formatted
The configuration file cmd/index/job/deletion/sample.yaml exists and contains a valid, well-structured YAML configuration for the index deletion service. The file includes all necessary sections:
- Server configuration (gRPC and health check servers)
- Deleter configuration with agent settings
- Observability settings
- Logging configuration
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and format of the configuration file
# Check if the config file exists
if [ -f "cmd/index/job/deletion/sample.yaml" ]; then
echo "Config file exists"
# Basic YAML validation
python3 -c "import yaml; yaml.safe_load(open('cmd/index/job/deletion/sample.yaml'))" 2>/dev/null
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
echo "Valid YAML format"
else
echo "Invalid YAML format"
fi
else
echo "Config file not found"
fi
Length of output: 256
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the Dockerfile for the COPY instruction of the config file
rg -A 2 "COPY.*\.ya?ml" dockers/index/job/deletion/Dockerfile
Length of output: 169
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the file exists and show its contents
if [ -f "cmd/index/job/deletion/sample.yaml" ]; then
echo "File exists. Contents:"
cat "cmd/index/job/deletion/sample.yaml"
else
# Search for similar yaml files in case of path mismatch
echo "File not found. Searching for similar yaml files:"
fd -e yaml -e yml . cmd/index/job/deletion/
fi
Length of output: 6230
dockers/index/job/correction/Dockerfile (2)
2-2: LGTM! Good practice enabling strict error checking.
The addition of # check=error=true directive ensures that the build will fail if any error occurs during the build process, improving build reliability.
89-89: LGTM! Secure configuration with distroless base and nonroot user.
The ENTRYPOINT configuration is correct and the overall setup follows security best practices by:
- Using distroless base image to reduce attack surface
- Running as nonroot user
- Properly configuring the entrypoint
dockers/tools/benchmark/job/Dockerfile (2)
Line range hint 89-97: Final stage setup follows security best practices
The final stage is well-configured:
- Uses distroless base image for minimal attack surface
- Copies only necessary artifacts
- Runs as non-root user
2-2: Verify consistent error checking across Dockerfiles
The addition of # check=error=true is a good practice for stricter error handling during builds.
Let's verify if this directive is consistently applied across other Dockerfiles:
✅ Verification successful
The previous output shows that the paths are different but doesn't show if the directive content is consistent. Let's verify the exact directive content across all Dockerfiles.
BuildKit error checking directive is consistently applied
The # check=error=true directive is uniformly applied across all Dockerfiles in the repository, indicating a consistent approach to error handling during builds. This is a good practice that is already standardized across the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if all Dockerfiles have the same error checking directive
rg -l "^# check=error" | grep -i dockerfile > /tmp/with_check
find . -type f -name "Dockerfile*" > /tmp/all_dockerfiles
diff /tmp/with_check /tmp/all_dockerfiles
Length of output: 2092
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual content of the error directive in Dockerfiles
rg "^# check=error" --no-filename | sort | uniq
Length of output: 68
dockers/agent/core/ngt/Dockerfile (3)
Line range hint 28-82: LGTM! Build configuration follows best practices.
The build stage is well-configured with:
- Efficient use of BuildKit cache mounts
- Proper package installation and cleanup
- Correct locale and timezone setup
Line range hint 84-98: LGTM! Final stage follows security best practices.
The final stage is well-configured with:
- Minimal distroless base image
- Non-root user execution
- Only necessary artifacts copied
2-2: LGTM! Verify consistency across other Dockerfiles.
The addition of # check=error=true is a good practice for strict error checking during builds.
Let's verify if this directive is consistently applied across other Dockerfiles:
✅ Verification successful
The check=error=true directive is consistently applied across all Dockerfiles
The verification shows that the BuildKit error checking directive is already standardized across all 26 Dockerfiles in the repository, including agent components, gateways, tools, and other services. This confirms that the addition in the NGT Dockerfile aligns with the project's established practices.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if other Dockerfiles have the same error checking directive
fd -t f -e Dockerfile . | while read -r file; do
echo "=== $file ==="
head -n 3 "$file"
done
Length of output: 40
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try with ripgrep to find Dockerfiles and their content
rg --type-add 'docker:*Dockerfile*' --type docker -l ""
echo "=== Dockerfile contents ==="
rg --type-add 'docker:*Dockerfile*' --type docker -A 3 "^#.*check.*error.*true"
Length of output: 7005
dockers/operator/helm/Dockerfile (3)
Line range hint 27-54: LGTM! Well-structured build configuration.
The build configuration demonstrates good practices:
- Multi-stage build for optimized image size
- Secure base image selection (distroless)
- Clear environment variable organization
110-110: LGTM! Properly configured ENTRYPOINT.
The ENTRYPOINT is correctly formatted using array syntax and includes all necessary parameters for the helm-operator.
2-2: LGTM! Verify consistency across other Dockerfiles.
The addition of # check=error=true is a good practice as it enables stricter error checking during the build process.
Let's verify if this directive is consistently used across other Dockerfiles:
✅ Verification successful
The check=error=true directive is consistently used across all Dockerfiles
The verification shows that the check=error=true directive is already present in all Dockerfiles across the repository, confirming consistent usage of this best practice for strict error checking during builds.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if other Dockerfiles have the same error checking directive
rg -l "^# check=error" $(fd Dockerfile)
Length of output: 1837
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (10)
hack/git/hooks/pre-commit (2)
40-40: Consider moving the renormalization outside the Go-specific blockWhile the addition of Git renormalization is good, its current placement inside the Go-specific condition means it only runs when Go files are modified. This could miss renormalization of other file types.
Consider moving it outside the
ifblock:if git diff HEAD^ --name-only | grep ".go$" > /dev/null; then # ... Go-specific operations ... mv -f ${TMPDIR}/go.mod . mv -f ${TMPDIR}/go.sum . - git diff --cached --name-only | xargs -r git add --renormalize fi +git diff --cached --name-only | xargs -r git add --renormalize
Pre-commit hook lacks executable permissions (644), needs to be set to 755
The pre-commit hook currently has read-write permissions (644) but lacks executable permissions required for Git hooks to function properly. The file permissions need to be updated to 755.
- File:
hack/git/hooks/pre-commit
- Current:
-rw-r--r--(644)- Required:
-rwxr-xr-x(755)🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-40: Verify the pre-commit hook permissionsThe script needs to be executable to function as a Git hook.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if the pre-commit hook is executable # Expected: File should have execute permission (755 or similar) ls -l hack/git/hooks/pre-commit # Also verify if it's properly linked in .git/hooks if [ -d .git/hooks ]; then ls -l .git/hooks/pre-commit fiLength of output: 132
.gitattributes (2)
18-37: LGTM! Consider adding configurations for additional file types.The file-specific configurations are well-structured with appropriate encodings and diff drivers. Consider adding configurations for additional common file types in your project:
.shfor shell scripts.tomlfor TOML configuration files.gradlefor Gradle build files.propertiesfor Java properties files
39-49: Consider adding more binary file typesThe binary and LFS configurations are good, but consider adding these common binary formats:
.jarfor Java archives.warfor Web archives.earfor Enterprise archives.dllfor Windows libraries.exefor Windows executables.libfor static librariesdockers/tools/benchmark/operator/Dockerfile (1)
Line range hint
46-77: Consider optimizing apt-get commandsWhile the current implementation is good, consider combining the apt-get commands to reduce layers and improve build efficiency:
- && apt-get clean \ - && apt-get update -y \ - && apt-get upgrade -y \ - && apt-get install -y --no-install-recommends --fix-missing \ + && apt-get update -y && apt-get upgrade -y \ + && DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive apt-get install -y --no-install-recommends --fix-missing \dockers/index/operator/Dockerfile (1)
Line range hint
46-82: Well-structured build configuration with efficient cachingThe build configuration demonstrates excellent practices:
- Proper use of BuildKit cache mounts for apt and Go build artifacts
- Efficient package management with clear cleanup
- Good use of tmpfs for temporary storage
- Appropriate locale and timezone configuration
Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of each mount type for better maintainability.
dockers/tools/benchmark/job/Dockerfile (1)
Line range hint
45-96: Excellent use of Docker build optimizationsThe RUN command implements several best practices for optimizing Docker builds:
- Uses mount options for efficient caching
- Properly manages apt package lists
- Combines commands to reduce layers
- Sets up locale and timezone correctly
However, consider adding explicit versions for system packages to ensure reproducible builds.
Consider adding version pinning for critical system packages:
&& apt-get install -y --no-install-recommends --fix-missing \ - build-essential \ - ca-certificates \ + build-essential=12.9 \ + ca-certificates=20230311 \dockers/tools/cli/loadtest/Dockerfile (1)
Line range hint
1-97: Add build documentationThe Dockerfile implements several advanced features and optimizations. Consider adding comments to document:
- The purpose of each mount cache
- Required build arguments
- Expected environment setup
Example documentation to add:
# syntax = docker/dockerfile:latest # check=error=true +# Build Arguments: +# - GO_VERSION: Version of Go to install +# - RUST_VERSION: Version of Rust to install +# - TARGETARCH: Target architecture for the build +# - TARGETOS: Target operating system for the build +# Cache Mounts: +# - /var/lib/apt: APT package lists +# - /var/cache/apt: APT package cache +# - ${GOPATH}/pkg: Go module cache +# - ${HOME}/.cache/go-build: Go build cachedockers/operator/helm/Dockerfile (2)
1-2: Excellent addition of error checking directive!The
check=error=truedirective enables stricter error checking during the Docker build process, which helps catch potential issues early in the build pipeline.This is a good practice that should be consistently applied across all Dockerfiles in the project for better build reliability.
Line range hint
63-71: Consider pinning package versions for better reproducibilityWhile the package installation is well-structured, consider pinning specific versions of essential packages for better build reproducibility and security.
Example modification:
- build-essential \ - ca-certificates \ - curl \ - tzdata \ - locales \ - git \ - upx \ + build-essential=12.9 \ + ca-certificates=20230311 \ + curl=7.88.1-10 \ + tzdata=2023c-5 \ + locales=2.36-9 \ + git=1:2.39.2-1.1 \ + upx=4.0.2-1 \
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
hack/docker/gen/main.gois excluded by!**/gen/**
📒 Files selected for processing (28)
.gitattributes(1 hunks)dockers/agent/core/agent/Dockerfile(2 hunks)dockers/agent/core/faiss/Dockerfile(2 hunks)dockers/agent/core/ngt/Dockerfile(2 hunks)dockers/agent/sidecar/Dockerfile(2 hunks)dockers/binfmt/Dockerfile(2 hunks)dockers/buildbase/Dockerfile(2 hunks)dockers/buildkit/Dockerfile(2 hunks)dockers/buildkit/syft/scanner/Dockerfile(2 hunks)dockers/ci/base/Dockerfile(2 hunks)dockers/dev/Dockerfile(2 hunks)dockers/discoverer/k8s/Dockerfile(2 hunks)dockers/example/client/Dockerfile(2 hunks)dockers/gateway/filter/Dockerfile(2 hunks)dockers/gateway/lb/Dockerfile(2 hunks)dockers/gateway/mirror/Dockerfile(2 hunks)dockers/index/job/correction/Dockerfile(2 hunks)dockers/index/job/creation/Dockerfile(2 hunks)dockers/index/job/deletion/Dockerfile(2 hunks)dockers/index/job/readreplica/rotate/Dockerfile(2 hunks)dockers/index/job/save/Dockerfile(2 hunks)dockers/index/operator/Dockerfile(2 hunks)dockers/manager/index/Dockerfile(2 hunks)dockers/operator/helm/Dockerfile(2 hunks)dockers/tools/benchmark/job/Dockerfile(2 hunks)dockers/tools/benchmark/operator/Dockerfile(2 hunks)dockers/tools/cli/loadtest/Dockerfile(2 hunks)hack/git/hooks/pre-commit(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (20)
- dockers/agent/core/faiss/Dockerfile
- dockers/agent/core/ngt/Dockerfile
- dockers/agent/sidecar/Dockerfile
- dockers/binfmt/Dockerfile
- dockers/buildbase/Dockerfile
- dockers/buildkit/Dockerfile
- dockers/buildkit/syft/scanner/Dockerfile
- dockers/ci/base/Dockerfile
- dockers/dev/Dockerfile
- dockers/discoverer/k8s/Dockerfile
- dockers/example/client/Dockerfile
- dockers/gateway/filter/Dockerfile
- dockers/gateway/lb/Dockerfile
- dockers/gateway/mirror/Dockerfile
- dockers/index/job/correction/Dockerfile
- dockers/index/job/creation/Dockerfile
- dockers/index/job/deletion/Dockerfile
- dockers/index/job/readreplica/rotate/Dockerfile
- dockers/index/job/save/Dockerfile
- dockers/manager/index/Dockerfile
🔇 Additional comments (17)
.gitattributes (1)
57-64: LGTM! Export ignore rules are comprehensive.
The vendor directory handling and export ignore rules are well-configured and follow best practices.
dockers/agent/core/agent/Dockerfile (3)
Line range hint 30-96: LGTM! Excellent build optimization practices.
The RUN command demonstrates several Docker best practices:
- Efficient use of mount options for caching and temporary storage
- Proper apt configuration and cleanup
- Well-organized dependency installation
97-97: LGTM! Follows security best practices.
The final stage configuration:
- Uses a minimal distroless base image
- Runs as nonroot user
- Contains only the necessary binary
2-2: LGTM! Verify consistency across other Dockerfiles.
The addition of # check=error=true is a good practice as it enables strict error checking during the build process.
Let's verify if this directive is consistently applied across other Dockerfiles:
✅ Verification successful
The check=error=true directive is consistently applied across all Dockerfiles
The verification shows that all Dockerfiles in the repository have the # check=error=true directive properly set in their headers, demonstrating consistent implementation of this best practice for strict error checking during builds.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistency of error checking directive across Dockerfiles
# Expected: All Dockerfiles should have the same error checking directive
echo "Checking Dockerfiles for error checking directive..."
fd -t f "Dockerfile$" | while read -r file; do
echo "=== $file ==="
head -n 3 "$file" | grep -E "^# check=error"
done
Length of output: 5395
dockers/tools/benchmark/operator/Dockerfile (3)
2-2: LGTM: Enhanced error handling during build
The addition of check=error=true is a good practice that ensures builds fail explicitly on errors rather than potentially continuing with issues.
89-89: LGTM: Secure configuration with proper permissions
The ENTRYPOINT configuration combined with nonroot user and distroless base image provides a secure runtime environment.
Line range hint 1-89: Verify consistency across other Dockerfiles
Since this is part of a larger Dockerfile refactoring effort, let's verify that similar improvements are consistently applied across other Dockerfiles in the repository.
✅ Verification successful
Dockerfile configurations are consistently applied across the repository
The verification shows that all application Dockerfiles consistently follow the same security and configuration patterns:
- Error directive
check=error=trueis present in all application Dockerfiles - All application containers use
nonroot:nonrootuser configuration - All application images are based on
gcr.io/distrolessfor minimal attack surface
The only Dockerfiles not following these patterns are infrastructure-related ones (buildbase, buildkit, ci, dev) which have different requirements.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistency in Dockerfile configurations across the repository
# Check for error directive in other Dockerfiles
echo "Checking for error directive consistency:"
fd -t f "Dockerfile$" | xargs grep -l "check=error=true"
# Check for proper user configuration
echo -e "\nChecking for nonroot user configuration:"
fd -t f "Dockerfile$" | xargs grep -l "USER nonroot:nonroot"
# Check for proper base images
echo -e "\nChecking for distroless usage:"
fd -t f "Dockerfile$" | xargs grep -l "FROM gcr.io/distroless"
Length of output: 2797
dockers/index/operator/Dockerfile (2)
89-89: LGTM: Proper ENTRYPOINT configuration
The ENTRYPOINT is correctly configured to run the index-operator binary with appropriate permissions and user context.
2-2: Verify BuildKit directive compatibility
The # check=error=true directive enables strict error checking during builds, which is good for catching issues early. However, we should ensure all build environments support this feature.
✅ Verification successful
BuildKit directive is consistently used across the project
The # check=error=true directive is used consistently across all Dockerfiles in the project (found in 26 Dockerfiles), indicating it's a standardized practice in the codebase. Since this is a widely adopted pattern within the project and BuildKit has been a stable feature since Docker 18.09, this directive is safe to use.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if other Dockerfiles in the repository use similar directives
# and verify the Docker version requirements
# Check for similar directives in other Dockerfiles
echo "Checking other Dockerfiles for BuildKit directives..."
fd -t f "Dockerfile$" | xargs rg "^#\s*check=error"
# Look for minimum Docker version requirements in documentation
echo "Checking for Docker version requirements..."
fd -t f "README.md$" | xargs rg -i "docker(\s+)version|buildkit"
Length of output: 1726
dockers/tools/benchmark/job/Dockerfile (3)
97-97: LGTM: Secure container configuration
The final stage implements security best practices:
- Uses distroless base image
- Runs as nonroot user
- Clear and simple entrypoint
Line range hint 1-97: Verify Dockerfile generator code
Since this Dockerfile is generated by hack/docker/gen/main.go, we should ensure the changes are made in the generator code rather than directly in this file.
✅ Verification successful
The verification results show that:
- The
check=error=truedirective exists in the generator code (hack/docker/gen/main.go) - The directive is consistently present across all generated Dockerfiles
Changes are correctly implemented in the generator code
The modification is properly implemented in the generator template and consistently applied across all generated Dockerfiles, ensuring uniformity in the build configuration.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that changes are reflected in the generator code
# Check the generator file
echo "Checking generator code for new directives:"
rg -A 5 "check=error=true" hack/docker/gen/main.go || true
# Verify if other generated Dockerfiles are consistent
echo -e "\nChecking consistency across generated Dockerfiles:"
fd Dockerfile | xargs grep -l "DO_NOT_EDIT.*generated" | \
xargs grep -l "check=error=true" || true
Length of output: 1655
2-2: Verify the impact of strict error checking
The addition of # check=error=true enables strict error checking during the Docker build process. This is a good practice for catching build issues early, but we should verify it doesn't break existing builds.
✅ Verification successful
The check=error=true directive is consistently used across generated Dockerfiles
The verification shows that this directive is systematically applied across all generated Dockerfiles in the repository (25 files found), indicating it's an intentional standardization implemented through the generator code in hack/docker/gen/main.go. This is a controlled change that maintains consistency across the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if other Dockerfiles in the repository have similar error checking
# and verify build success rates before/after this change.
# Find all Dockerfiles and check for error directive
echo "Checking error directives in other Dockerfiles:"
fd Dockerfile | xargs grep -l "check=error=true" || true
# Check build history to identify potential issues
echo -e "\nChecking recent build history:"
gh run list --workflow="Build" --limit 10 --json conclusion,createdAt,displayTitle \
| jq -r '.[] | "\(.createdAt) \(.conclusion) \(.displayTitle)"'
Length of output: 1655
dockers/tools/cli/loadtest/Dockerfile (3)
97-97: Verify sample configuration file existence
The Dockerfile copies a sample configuration file to /etc/server/config.yaml. Ensure this file exists and contains valid configuration.
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and validity of the sample configuration
# Check if sample.yaml exists
echo "Checking for sample configuration:"
fd "sample.yaml" -p "cmd/tools/cli/loadtest/"
# Verify YAML syntax if file exists
if [ -f "cmd/tools/cli/loadtest/sample.yaml" ]; then
echo "Validating YAML syntax:"
cat "cmd/tools/cli/loadtest/sample.yaml" | python3 -c "import sys, yaml; yaml.safe_load(sys.stdin)"
fiLine range hint 82-82: Verify HDF5 installation security
The make hdf5/install command installs HDF5, which is a complex dependency. Ensure that:
- The installation source is secure
- The version is pinned
- Known vulnerabilities are checked
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check HDF5 installation method and version pinning
# Check HDF5 installation method in Makefile
echo "HDF5 installation method:"
rg "hdf5/install" -A 5
# Look for version pinning
echo "HDF5 version specification:"
rg "HDF5_VERSION" --type make1-2: Verify the impact of strict error checking
The addition of check=error=true enforces stricter error handling during builds, which is good for production reliability. However, this might affect existing CI/CD pipelines.
Consider adding this directive to all Dockerfiles in the repository for consistent error handling.
✅ Verification successful
This script will help us see the headers of all Dockerfiles to better understand the usage of BuildKit directives and error checking across the codebase.
No changes needed - error checking is consistently used
The check=error=true directive is already consistently implemented across all Dockerfiles in the repository. This shows it's an established pattern in the project, making the change in this file aligned with the project's standards.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if other Dockerfiles in the repository use similar error checking
# to ensure consistency across builds
# Search for Dockerfiles without error checking
echo "Dockerfiles without error checking:"
fd Dockerfile | while read -r file; do
if ! grep -q "check=error=true" "$file"; then
echo "- $file"
fi
done
Length of output: 6338
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for Dockerfiles and their error checking directives more thoroughly
echo "=== Checking Dockerfiles for error checking directives ==="
fd Dockerfile | while read -r file; do
echo "=== $file ==="
head -n 5 "$file"
echo "---"
done
Length of output: 7765
dockers/operator/helm/Dockerfile (2)
Line range hint 98-110: Excellent security practices in the final stage!
The final stage implements several security best practices:
- Using distroless base image minimizes attack surface
- Running as nonroot user enhances security
- Minimal file copying reduces image size
Let's verify the security posture:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify security best practices in Dockerfile
# Check for any root user references or sensitive file permissions
# Check for root user references
rg -i "USER\s+root" dockers/operator/helm/
# Check for any sensitive file permission changes
rg -i "chmod\s+777" dockers/operator/helm/Line range hint 1-110: Verify consistency across other Dockerfiles
Since this file is auto-generated, let's ensure the improvements (error checking directive, security practices) are consistently applied across all Dockerfiles.
✅ Verification successful
Security best practices and error checking are consistently applied
The verification shows that all service-related Dockerfiles consistently implement:
- Error checking directive (
check=error=true) - Distroless base images for runtime
- Non-root user execution
The differences in implementation counts are expected as some Dockerfiles (like buildbase, buildkit, etc.) are build-time containers that require root access and different base images.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify consistency of Dockerfile improvements across the project
# Check for error directive in other Dockerfiles
echo "Checking for error directive in Dockerfiles:"
fd Dockerfile$ | xargs grep -l "check=error=true"
# Check for distroless usage
echo "Checking for distroless usage:"
fd Dockerfile$ | xargs grep -l "gcr.io/distroless/static:nonroot"
# Check for nonroot user
echo "Checking for nonroot user:"
fd Dockerfile$ | xargs grep -l "USER nonroot:nonroot"
Length of output: 2720
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Signed-off-by: Yusuke Kato <[email protected]>
Deploying vald with
|
| Latest commit: |
0e71b0f
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://b71e1fda.vald.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://refactor-docker-dockergen-an.vald.pages.dev |
* refactor dockerfiles and update gitattributes Signed-off-by: kpango <[email protected]> * Update .gitattributes Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Signed-off-by: Yusuke Kato <[email protected]> --------- Signed-off-by: kpango <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Yusuke Kato <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* refactor dockerfiles and update gitattributes Signed-off-by: kpango <[email protected]> * Update .gitattributes Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Signed-off-by: Yusuke Kato <[email protected]> --------- Signed-off-by: kpango <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Yusuke Kato <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Signed-off-by: kpango <[email protected]>
* refactor dockerfiles and update gitattributes * Update .gitattributes --------- Signed-off-by: kpango <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Yusuke Kato <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Yusuke Kato <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* refactor dockerfiles and update gitattributes Signed-off-by: kpango <[email protected]> * Update .gitattributes Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Signed-off-by: Yusuke Kato <[email protected]> --------- Signed-off-by: kpango <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Yusuke Kato <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* refactor dockerfiles and update gitattributes Signed-off-by: kpango <[email protected]> * Update .gitattributes Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Signed-off-by: Yusuke Kato <[email protected]> --------- Signed-off-by: kpango <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Yusuke Kato <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Description
SSIA
Related Issue
Versions
Checklist
Special notes for your reviewer
Summary by CodeRabbit
.gitattributesfor consistent text encoding and end-of-line handling across various file types, enhancing clarity in diffs and managing binary files effectively.