Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix segmentCount type in formik string field #58

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 15, 2024

Conversation

jajakob
Copy link
Collaborator

@jajakob jajakob commented Oct 15, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Updated the handling of the segment count in the game management form to ensure correct data type processing.
  • New Features

    • Enhanced the ManageGame component for improved form submission with the segment count.

@jajakob jajakob requested a review from rschlaefli October 15, 2024 07:11
@jajakob jajakob self-assigned this Oct 15, 2024
Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 15, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
gbl-uzh ❌ Failed (Inspect) Oct 15, 2024 7:11am

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 15, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the ManageGame component in the apps/demo-game/src/pages/admin/games/[id].tsx file. It changes the segmentCount field in the Formik form's initial values from a number to a string, requiring parsing back to a number for the addGamePeriod mutation. The onSubmit function is updated to parse variables.segmentCount before mutation. No changes are made to the control flow or other functionalities of the component.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
apps/demo-game/src/pages/admin/games/[id].tsx - Changed segmentCount in Formik's initial values from a number to a string ('4').
- Updated onSubmit function to parse variables.segmentCount back to a number before mutation.

Possibly related PRs


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@jajakob jajakob merged commit e4a8a41 into dev Oct 15, 2024
1 of 2 checks passed
@jajakob jajakob deleted the jakob/demo-game-fix-period-generation branch October 15, 2024 07:11
Copy link

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant