-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 183
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove with-parent-controls developmental feature #1819
Remove with-parent-controls developmental feature #1819
Conversation
…in the profile resolution spec that didn't exist in the model. Instead of updating the model, this PR removes the "with-parent-controls" feature from the profile resolution spec. This developmental feature should be removed for the following reasons. - This feature is not implemented in any of the current XSLT or Java implementations. - This feature is not being requested from a significant segment of the user community. The related issue usnistgov#1662 has support from 1 community member outside the NIST team. - This feature is extremely difficult to implement along with with-child-controls, which works on the opposite axis. - IMHO, profile resolution doesn't need to be made more complicated than it already is.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we need a followup issue to modify the Profile Resolution Specification?
LGTM in any case.
Specification has been updated in the PR before review, so looks to go to review, I am doing so now. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The with-parent-controls
flag is still included in dangling code even if removed by select-control-by-id
, we need to remove that first.
NOTE to NIST Team: let's make sure we use the reviewer guidance re the checklist and checking for dead code during review.
I am going to rebase with the Markdown fix soon enough, so I will merge this first. |
* Revert changes from usnistgov#1717 that address a documented feature in the profile resolution spec that didn't exist in the model. Instead of updating the model, this PR removes the "with-parent-controls" feature from the profile resolution spec. This developmental feature should be removed for the following reasons. - This feature is not implemented in any of the current XSLT or Java implementations. - This feature is not being requested from a significant segment of the user community. The related issue usnistgov#1662 has support from 1 community member outside the NIST team. - This feature is extremely difficult to implement along with with-child-controls, which works on the opposite axis. - IMHO, profile resolution doesn't need to be made more complicated than it already is. * PR review, delete dangling with-parent-controls flag. --------- Co-authored-by: A.J. Stein <[email protected]>
* Revert changes from usnistgov#1717 that address a documented feature in the profile resolution spec that didn't exist in the model. Instead of updating the model, this PR removes the "with-parent-controls" feature from the profile resolution spec. This developmental feature should be removed for the following reasons. - This feature is not implemented in any of the current XSLT or Java implementations. - This feature is not being requested from a significant segment of the user community. The related issue usnistgov#1662 has support from 1 community member outside the NIST team. - This feature is extremely difficult to implement along with with-child-controls, which works on the opposite axis. - IMHO, profile resolution doesn't need to be made more complicated than it already is. * PR review, delete dangling with-parent-controls flag. --------- Co-authored-by: A.J. Stein <[email protected]>
Committer Notes
This PR revert changes from #1717 that address a documented feature in the profile resolution spec that didn't exist in the OSCAL profile model. Instead of updating the model, this PR removes the "with-parent-controls" feature from the profile resolution spec.
This developmental feature should be removed for the following reasons.
All Submissions:
By submitting a pull request, you are agreeing to provide this contribution under the CC0 1.0 Universal public domain dedication.
(For reviewers: The wiki has guidance on code review and overall issue review for completeness.)
Changes to Core Features:
Have you written new tests for your core changes, as applicable?Have you included examples of how to use your new feature(s)?Have you updated all OSCAL website and readme documentation affected by the changes you made? Changes to the OSCAL website can be made in the docs/content directory of your branch.