-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Addresses overly optimistic wind capacity factor issue #36
Conversation
Hello @samgdotson! Thanks for updating this PR. We checked the lines you've touched for PEP 8 issues, and found:
Comment last updated at 2024-09-03 14:34:03 UTC |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I left 3 comments, let me know if you can't see them,
-Sandra
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@ | |||
state_abbr: 'IL' | |||
version: "5.0-test" | |||
scenario: "no_growth_no_export" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Will you be doing a growth scenario in this analysis?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, as discussed. The config file represents the easily tunable parameters. In the technical appendix we can have a table describing the value of each (or a select set) parameter for a particular scenario.
n.generators.carrier).sum().T | ||
|
||
return p_by_carrier | ||
|
||
|
||
def plot_dispatch(n, year=2025, month=7): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We'll talk about this on Thursday I'm sure, but as we are producing products for this analysis we may not want to show area plots - we might want to show bar charts or line charts instead (depending on the output). But we can go into more detail about that later.
|
||
return fuel_costs | ||
|
||
|
||
def load_existing_generators(): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm still a little confused on how you're dealing with "no exports" since the data that you have for existing generators included exports in that past year. Is this an issue?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"Exports," here, just means that the total "demand" is equal to the total historical generation (since IL is an energy exporter). Removing "exports" means the total demand is equal to the historical retail sales within IL (about 2/3 of total generation).
@ssattler if you're satisfied with the changes in this pull request, would you mind hitting the big green "merge pull request" button? In general, it's best practice for somebody else (besides the person making the PR) to merge a pull request. For chronological reasons, this PR needs to be merged after #35. PRs are listed newest to oldest by default, so this one appears to be "first" on the list. Thanks! |
Important
This PR should be reviewed after #34 has been merged.
This PR closes #35 by adding a parameter to the
config.yml
file calledcapacity_factor
. Theadd_electricity
rule modifies the wind availability time series by renormalizing to thecapacity_factor
value.