Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Fix backwards compatibility with old GDBservers (PR remote/22597)
At <https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2017-12/msg00285.html>, Maciej reported that commit: commit 5cd63fd Date: Wed Oct 4 18:21:10 2017 +0100 Subject: Fix "Remote 'g' packet reply is too long" problems with multiple inferiors made GDB stop working with older stubs. Any attempt to continue execution after the initial connection fails with: [...] Process .../gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.base/advance/advance created; pid = 2670 Listening on port 2346 target remote [...]:2346 Remote debugging using [...]:2346 Reading symbols from .../lib64/ld.so.1...done. [Switching to Thread <main>] (gdb) continue Cannot execute this command without a live selected thread. (gdb) The problem is: (gdb) c Cannot execute this command without a live selected thread. (gdb) info threads Id Target Id Frame 1 Thread 14917 0x00007f341cd98ed0 in _start () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 The current thread <Thread ID 2> has terminated. See `help thread'. ^^^^^^^^^^^ (gdb) Note, thread _2_. There's really only one thread in the inferior (it's still at the entry point), but still GDB added a bogus second thread. The reason GDB started adding a second thread after 5cd63fd is this hunk: + if (event->ptid == null_ptid) + { + const char *thr = strstr (p1 + 1, ";thread:"); + if (thr != NULL) + event->ptid = read_ptid (thr + strlen (";thread:"), + NULL); + else + event->ptid = magic_null_ptid; + } Note the else branch that falls back to magic_null_ptid. We reach that when we process the initial stop reply sent back in response to the the "?" (status) packet early in the connection setup: Sending packet: $?#3f...Ack Packet received: T0506:0000000000000000;07:40a510f4fd7f0000;10:d0fe1201577f0000; And note that that response does not include a ";thread:XXX" part. This stop reply is processed after listing threads with qfThreadInfo / qsThreadInfo : Sending packet: $qfThreadInfo#bb...Ack Packet received: m3915 Sending packet: $qsThreadInfo#c8...Ack Packet received: l meaning, when we process that stop reply, we treat the event as coming from a thread with ptid == magic_null_ptid, which is not yet in the thread list, so we add it then: (top-gdb) p ptid $1 = {m_pid = 42000, m_lwp = -1, m_tid = 1} (top-gdb) bt #0 0x0000000000840a8c in add_thread_silent(ptid_t) (ptid=...) at src/gdb/thread.c:269 #1 0x00000000007ad61d in remote_add_thread(ptid_t, int, int) (ptid=..., running=0, executing=0) at src/gdb/remote.c:1838 #2 0x00000000007ad8de in remote_notice_new_inferior(ptid_t, int) (currthread=..., executing=0) at src/gdb/remote.c:1921 #3 0x00000000007b758b in process_stop_reply(stop_reply*, target_waitstatus*) (stop_reply=0x1158860, status=0x7fffffffcc00) at src/gdb/remote.c:7217 #4 0x00000000007b7a38 in remote_wait_as(ptid_t, target_waitstatus*, int) (ptid=..., status=0x7fffffffcc00, options=0) at src/gdb/remote.c:7380 #5 0x00000000007b7cd1 in remote_wait(target_ops*, ptid_t, target_waitstatus*, int) (ops=0x102fac0 <remote_ops>, ptid=..., status=0x7fffffffcc00, options=0) at src/gdb/remote.c:7446 #6 0x000000000081587b in delegate_wait(target_ops*, ptid_t, target_waitstatus*, int) (self=0x102fac0 <remote_ops>, arg1=..., arg2=0x7fffffffcc00, arg3=0) at src/gdb/target-delegates.c:138 #7 0x0000000000827d77 in target_wait(ptid_t, target_waitstatus*, int) (ptid=..., status=0x7fffffffcc00, options=0) at src/gdb/target.c:2179 #8 0x0000000000715fda in do_target_wait(ptid_t, target_waitstatus*, int) (ptid=..., status=0x7fffffffcc00, options=0) at src/gdb/infrun.c:3589 #9 0x0000000000716351 in wait_for_inferior() () at src/gdb/infrun.c:3707 #10 0x0000000000715435 in start_remote(int) (from_tty=1) at src/gdb/infrun.c:3212 things go downhill from this. We don't see the problem with current master gdbserver, because that version always sends the ";thread:" part in the initial stop reply: Sending packet: $?#3f...Packet received: T0506:0000000000000000;07:a0d4ffffff7f0000;10:d05eddf7ff7f0000;thread:p3cea.3cea;core:3; Years ago I had added a "--disable-packet=" command line option to gdbserver which comes in handy for testing this, since the existing "--disable-packet=Tthread" precisely makes gdbserver not send that ";thread:" part in stop replies. The testcase added by this commit emulates old gdbserver making use of that. I've compared a testrun at 5cd63fd^ (before regression) with 'current master+patch', against old gdbserver at f8b73d1^. I hacked out --once, and "monitor exit" to be able to test. The results are a bit too unstable to tell accurately, but it looked like there were no regressions. Maciej confirmed this worked for him as well. No regressions on master (against master gdbserver). gdb/ChangeLog: 2018-01-11 Pedro Alves <[email protected]> PR remote/22597 * remote.c (remote_parse_stop_reply): Default to the last-set general thread instead of to 'magic_null_ptid'. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2018-01-11 Pedro Alves <[email protected]> PR remote/22597 * gdb.server/stop-reply-no-thread.c: New file. * gdb.server/stop-reply-no-thread.exp: New file.
- Loading branch information