-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
More predicate pushdown in ClickHouse connector #7100
Comments
@findepi - would it be possible to elaborate on what "more pushdown" means? It's not clear which TODOs you mean. Ideally, if we could break this down into specific pushdown improvements that would correspond to individual PRs. |
@JamesRTaylor most of it is regarding untested code (pushdown for text types) and decimal predicates A quick grep gives me:
I've edited the issue description accordingly to mention some of these. |
Is pushdown for TIMESTAMP types complete? See here for more context. |
@JamesRTaylor Predicate pushdown happens on |
Hi, any news for predicate pushdown for textual types? |
@mathsteam Tests will need to be added to verify the effect and fix any failures accordingly. See |
Let me do this. |
@tangjiangling Are you still working on textual types pushdown on ClickHouse? If not, I would like to take this |
Not at the moment, you can take over. |
Any progress on textual types pushdown? |
@ebyhr, could you point me what needs to be checked to guarantee correctness of enabling predicate pushdown for textual types (when ClickHouse It's clear how to check that expressions were actually pushed-down (for this I can refer to |
See TODOs in the code referring to this issue
These include (not an exhaustive list):
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: