-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 523
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
try to improve codecov #1028
try to improve codecov #1028
Conversation
287e0bb
to
68be298
Compare
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1028 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 70.33% 69.36% -0.98%
==========================================
Files 14 14
Lines 3486 3486
Branches 465 465
==========================================
- Hits 2452 2418 -34
- Misses 971 1004 +33
- Partials 63 64 +1
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Seems codecov does not support Azure DevOps. oh well coveralls it is then. |
oh ... what? I thought coveralls was the one that does not play nicely yet with Azure DevOps. So both are not really there yet? Classic early adopter problems I guess. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Travis already has a shell function that retries.
We should probably use that instead.
If we can't use coveralls; we might need to try to fix it. Here it just retries if fails.