Hell of a perfectionist. #99

ghost · 2014-06-05T17:52:58Z

No description provided.

Turn it into (for example): [ 0.073380] x86: Booting SMP configuration: [ 0.074005] .... node #0, CPUs: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 torvalds#6 torvalds#7 [ 0.603005] .... node #1, CPUs: torvalds#8 torvalds#9 torvalds#10 torvalds#11 torvalds#12 torvalds#13 torvalds#14 torvalds#15 [ 1.200005] .... node #2, CPUs: torvalds#16 torvalds#17 torvalds#18 torvalds#19 torvalds#20 torvalds#21 torvalds#22 torvalds#23 [ 1.796005] .... node #3, CPUs: torvalds#24 torvalds#25 torvalds#26 torvalds#27 torvalds#28 torvalds#29 torvalds#30 torvalds#31 [ 2.393005] .... node #4, CPUs: torvalds#32 torvalds#33 torvalds#34 torvalds#35 torvalds#36 torvalds#37 torvalds#38 torvalds#39 [ 2.996005] .... node #5, CPUs: torvalds#40 torvalds#41 torvalds#42 torvalds#43 torvalds#44 torvalds#45 torvalds#46 torvalds#47 [ 3.600005] .... node torvalds#6, CPUs: torvalds#48 torvalds#49 torvalds#50 torvalds#51 #52 #53 torvalds#54 torvalds#55 [ 4.202005] .... node torvalds#7, CPUs: torvalds#56 torvalds#57 #58 torvalds#59 torvalds#60 torvalds#61 torvalds#62 torvalds#63 [ 4.811005] .... node torvalds#8, CPUs: torvalds#64 torvalds#65 torvalds#66 torvalds#67 torvalds#68 torvalds#69 #70 torvalds#71 [ 5.421006] .... node torvalds#9, CPUs: torvalds#72 torvalds#73 torvalds#74 torvalds#75 torvalds#76 torvalds#77 torvalds#78 torvalds#79 [ 6.032005] .... node torvalds#10, CPUs: torvalds#80 torvalds#81 torvalds#82 torvalds#83 torvalds#84 torvalds#85 torvalds#86 torvalds#87 [ 6.648006] .... node torvalds#11, CPUs: torvalds#88 torvalds#89 torvalds#90 torvalds#91 torvalds#92 torvalds#93 torvalds#94 torvalds#95 [ 7.262005] .... node torvalds#12, CPUs: torvalds#96 torvalds#97 torvalds#98 torvalds#99 torvalds#100 torvalds#101 torvalds#102 torvalds#103 [ 7.865005] .... node torvalds#13, CPUs: torvalds#104 torvalds#105 torvalds#106 torvalds#107 torvalds#108 torvalds#109 torvalds#110 torvalds#111 [ 8.466005] .... node torvalds#14, CPUs: torvalds#112 torvalds#113 torvalds#114 torvalds#115 torvalds#116 torvalds#117 torvalds#118 torvalds#119 [ 9.073006] .... node torvalds#15, CPUs: torvalds#120 torvalds#121 torvalds#122 torvalds#123 torvalds#124 torvalds#125 torvalds#126 torvalds#127 [ 9.679901] x86: Booted up 16 nodes, 128 CPUs and drop useless elements. Change num_digits() to hpa's division-avoiding, cell-phone-typed version which he went at great lengths and pains to submit on a Saturday evening. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

ariccio · 2014-06-17T03:27:54Z

Yeah, this is annoying, but _Linus does not merge pull requests from GitHub_.

WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations torvalds#99: FILE: mm/mlock.c:649: + vm_flags_t vm_flags = VM_LOCKED; + if (flags) total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 51 lines checked ./patches/mm-mlock-add-new-mlock-system-call.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: Eric B Munson <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]> WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#99: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2965: + * zone list (with a backoff mechanism which is a function of no_progress_loops). WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#129: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2995: + * Keep reclaiming pages while there is a chance this will lead somewhere. WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#134: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3000: + for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, ac->zonelist, ac->high_zoneidx, ac->nodemask) { WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#138: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3004: + available -= DIV_ROUND_UP(no_progress_loops * available, MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES); WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#142: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3008: + * Would the allocation succeed if we reclaimed the whole available? WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#146: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3012: + /* Wait for some write requests to complete then retry */ total: 0 errors, 6 warnings, 202 lines checked ./patches/mm-oom-rework-oom-detection.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]> Cc: Hillf Danton <[email protected]> Cc: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]> Cc: Mel Gorman <[email protected]> Cc: Michal Hocko <[email protected]> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 17da2d5 ] As reported: [ 256.104522] ====================================================== [ 256.113783] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 256.120093] 5.16.0-rc6-yocto-standard+ torvalds#99 Not tainted [ 256.125362] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 256.131673] intel-speed-sel/844 is trying to acquire lock: [ 256.137290] ffffffffc036f0d0 (punit_misc_dev_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: isst_if_open+0x18/0x90 [isst_if_common] [ 256.147171] [ 256.147171] but task is already holding lock: [ 256.153135] ffffffff8ee7cb50 (misc_mtx){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: misc_open+0x2a/0x170 [ 256.160407] [ 256.160407] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 256.160407] [ 256.168712] [ 256.168712] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 256.176327] [ 256.176327] -> #1 (misc_mtx){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 256.181946] lock_acquire+0x1e6/0x330 [ 256.186265] __mutex_lock+0x9b/0x9b0 [ 256.190497] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20 [ 256.195075] misc_register+0x32/0x1a0 [ 256.199390] isst_if_cdev_register+0x65/0x180 [isst_if_common] [ 256.205878] isst_if_probe+0x144/0x16e [isst_if_mmio] ... [ 256.241976] [ 256.241976] -> #0 (punit_misc_dev_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 256.248552] validate_chain+0xbc6/0x1750 [ 256.253131] __lock_acquire+0x88c/0xc10 [ 256.257618] lock_acquire+0x1e6/0x330 [ 256.261933] __mutex_lock+0x9b/0x9b0 [ 256.266165] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20 [ 256.270739] isst_if_open+0x18/0x90 [isst_if_common] [ 256.276356] misc_open+0x100/0x170 [ 256.280409] chrdev_open+0xa5/0x1e0 ... The call sequence suggested that misc_device /dev file can be opened before misc device is yet to be registered, which is done only once. Here punit_misc_dev_lock was used as common lock, to protect the registration by multiple ISST HW drivers, one time setup, prevent duplicate registry of misc device and prevent load/unload when device is open. We can split into locks: - One which just prevent duplicate call to misc_register() and one time setup. Also never call again if the misc_register() failed or required one time setup is failed. This lock is not shared with any misc device callbacks. - The other lock protects registry, load and unload of HW drivers. Sequence in isst_if_cdev_register() - Register callbacks under punit_misc_dev_open_lock - Call isst_misc_reg() which registers misc_device on the first registry which is under punit_misc_dev_reg_lock, which is not shared with callbacks. Sequence in isst_if_cdev_unregister Just opposite of isst_if_cdev_register Reported-and-tested-by: Liwei Song <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

driver defect clean up: torvalds#40 torvalds#41 torvalds#99 torvalds#100 torvalds#395 torvalds#396 torvalds#475 torvalds#614 torvalds#669 Change-Id: I581aaa8a1b950278bbf74d0c94aa647de89e07a9 Signed-off-by: Evoke Zhang <[email protected]>

Currently, test_progs outputs all stdout/stderr as it runs, and when it is done, prints a summary. It is non-trivial for tooling to parse that output and extract meaningful information from it. This change adds a new option, `--json-summary`/`-J` that let the caller specify a file where `test_progs{,-no_alu32}` can write a summary of the run in a json format that can later be parsed by tooling. Currently, it creates a summary section with successes/skipped/failures followed by a list of failed tests and subtests. A test contains the following fields: - name: the name of the test - number: the number of the test - message: the log message that was printed by the test. - failed: A boolean indicating whether the test failed or not. Currently we only output failed tests, but in the future, successful tests could be added. - subtests: A list of subtests associated with this test. A subtest contains the following fields: - name: same as above - number: sanme as above - message: the log message that was printed by the subtest. - failed: same as above but for the subtest An example run and json content below: ``` $ sudo ./test_progs -a $(grep -v '^#' ./DENYLIST.aarch64 | awk '{print $1","}' | tr -d '\n') -j -J /tmp/test_progs.json $ jq < /tmp/test_progs.json | head -n 30 { "success": 29, "success_subtest": 23, "skipped": 3, "failed": 28, "results": [ { "name": "bpf_cookie", "number": 10, "message": "test_bpf_cookie:PASS:skel_open 0 nsec\n", "failed": true, "subtests": [ { "name": "multi_kprobe_link_api", "number": 2, "message": "kprobe_multi_link_api_subtest:PASS:load_kallsyms 0 nsec\nlibbpf: extern 'bpf_testmod_fentry_test1' (strong): not resolved\nlibbpf: failed to load object 'kprobe_multi'\nlibbpf: failed to load BPF skeleton 'kprobe_multi': -3\nkprobe_multi_link_api_subtest:FAIL:fentry_raw_skel_load unexpected error: -3\n", "failed": true }, { "name": "multi_kprobe_attach_api", "number": 3, "message": "libbpf: extern 'bpf_testmod_fentry_test1' (strong): not resolved\nlibbpf: failed to load object 'kprobe_multi'\nlibbpf: failed to load BPF skeleton 'kprobe_multi': -3\nkprobe_multi_attach_api_subtest:FAIL:fentry_raw_skel_load unexpected error: -3\n", "failed": true }, { "name": "lsm", "number": 8, "message": "lsm_subtest:PASS:lsm.link_create 0 nsec\nlsm_subtest:FAIL:stack_mprotect unexpected stack_mprotect: actual 0 != expected -1\n", "failed": true } ``` The file can then be used to print a summary of the test run and list of failing tests/subtests: ``` $ jq -r < /tmp/test_progs.json '"Success: \(.success)/\(.success_subtest), Skipped: \(.skipped), Failed: \(.failed)"' Success: 29/23, Skipped: 3, Failed: 28 $ jq -r < /tmp/test_progs.json '.results | map([ if .failed then "#\(.number) \(.name)" else empty end, ( . as {name: $tname, number: $tnum} | .subtests | map( if .failed then "#\($tnum)/\(.number) \($tname)/\(.name)" else empty end ) ) ]) | flatten | .[]' | head -n 20 torvalds#10 bpf_cookie torvalds#10/2 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api torvalds#10/3 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api torvalds#10/8 bpf_cookie/lsm torvalds#15 bpf_mod_race torvalds#15/1 bpf_mod_race/ksym (used_btfs UAF) torvalds#15/2 bpf_mod_race/kfunc (kfunc_btf_tab UAF) torvalds#36 cgroup_hierarchical_stats torvalds#61 deny_namespace torvalds#61/1 deny_namespace/unpriv_userns_create_no_bpf torvalds#73 fexit_stress torvalds#83 get_func_ip_test torvalds#99 kfunc_dynptr_param torvalds#99/1 kfunc_dynptr_param/dynptr_data_null torvalds#99/4 kfunc_dynptr_param/dynptr_data_null torvalds#100 kprobe_multi_bench_attach torvalds#100/1 kprobe_multi_bench_attach/kernel torvalds#100/2 kprobe_multi_bench_attach/modules torvalds#101 kprobe_multi_test torvalds#101/1 kprobe_multi_test/skel_api ``` Signed-off-by: Manu Bretelle <[email protected]>

Currently, test_progs outputs all stdout/stderr as it runs, and when it is done, prints a summary. It is non-trivial for tooling to parse that output and extract meaningful information from it. This change adds a new option, `--json-summary`/`-J` that let the caller specify a file where `test_progs{,-no_alu32}` can write a summary of the run in a json format that can later be parsed by tooling. Currently, it creates a summary section with successes/skipped/failures followed by a list of failed tests and subtests. A test contains the following fields: - name: the name of the test - number: the number of the test - message: the log message that was printed by the test. - failed: A boolean indicating whether the test failed or not. Currently we only output failed tests, but in the future, successful tests could be added. - subtests: A list of subtests associated with this test. A subtest contains the following fields: - name: same as above - number: sanme as above - message: the log message that was printed by the subtest. - failed: same as above but for the subtest An example run and json content below: ``` $ sudo ./test_progs -a $(grep -v '^#' ./DENYLIST.aarch64 | awk '{print $1","}' | tr -d '\n') -j -J /tmp/test_progs.json $ jq < /tmp/test_progs.json | head -n 30 { "success": 29, "success_subtest": 23, "skipped": 3, "failed": 28, "results": [ { "name": "bpf_cookie", "number": 10, "message": "test_bpf_cookie:PASS:skel_open 0 nsec\n", "failed": true, "subtests": [ { "name": "multi_kprobe_link_api", "number": 2, "message": "kprobe_multi_link_api_subtest:PASS:load_kallsyms 0 nsec\nlibbpf: extern 'bpf_testmod_fentry_test1' (strong): not resolved\nlibbpf: failed to load object 'kprobe_multi'\nlibbpf: failed to load BPF skeleton 'kprobe_multi': -3\nkprobe_multi_link_api_subtest:FAIL:fentry_raw_skel_load unexpected error: -3\n", "failed": true }, { "name": "multi_kprobe_attach_api", "number": 3, "message": "libbpf: extern 'bpf_testmod_fentry_test1' (strong): not resolved\nlibbpf: failed to load object 'kprobe_multi'\nlibbpf: failed to load BPF skeleton 'kprobe_multi': -3\nkprobe_multi_attach_api_subtest:FAIL:fentry_raw_skel_load unexpected error: -3\n", "failed": true }, { "name": "lsm", "number": 8, "message": "lsm_subtest:PASS:lsm.link_create 0 nsec\nlsm_subtest:FAIL:stack_mprotect unexpected stack_mprotect: actual 0 != expected -1\n", "failed": true } ``` The file can then be used to print a summary of the test run and list of failing tests/subtests: ``` $ jq -r < /tmp/test_progs.json '"Success: \(.success)/\(.success_subtest), Skipped: \(.skipped), Failed: \(.failed)"' Success: 29/23, Skipped: 3, Failed: 28 $ jq -r < /tmp/test_progs.json '.results | map([ if .failed then "#\(.number) \(.name)" else empty end, ( . as {name: $tname, number: $tnum} | .subtests | map( if .failed then "#\($tnum)/\(.number) \($tname)/\(.name)" else empty end ) ) ]) | flatten | .[]' | head -n 20 torvalds#10 bpf_cookie torvalds#10/2 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api torvalds#10/3 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api torvalds#10/8 bpf_cookie/lsm torvalds#15 bpf_mod_race torvalds#15/1 bpf_mod_race/ksym (used_btfs UAF) torvalds#15/2 bpf_mod_race/kfunc (kfunc_btf_tab UAF) torvalds#36 cgroup_hierarchical_stats torvalds#61 deny_namespace torvalds#61/1 deny_namespace/unpriv_userns_create_no_bpf torvalds#73 fexit_stress torvalds#83 get_func_ip_test torvalds#99 kfunc_dynptr_param torvalds#99/1 kfunc_dynptr_param/dynptr_data_null torvalds#99/4 kfunc_dynptr_param/dynptr_data_null torvalds#100 kprobe_multi_bench_attach torvalds#100/1 kprobe_multi_bench_attach/kernel torvalds#100/2 kprobe_multi_bench_attach/modules torvalds#101 kprobe_multi_test torvalds#101/1 kprobe_multi_test/skel_api ``` Signed-off-by: Manu Bretelle <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]

The following test_verifier subtest failed due to new encoding for BSWAP. $ ./test_verifier ... torvalds#99/u invalid 64-bit BPF_END FAIL Unexpected success to load! verification time 215 usec stack depth 0 processed 3 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states 0 peak_states 0 mark_read 0 torvalds#99/p invalid 64-bit BPF_END FAIL Unexpected success to load! verification time 198 usec stack depth 0 processed 3 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states 0 peak_states 0 mark_read 0 Tighten the test so it still reports a failure. Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>

Stylefix.

c195df8

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Hell of a perfectionist. #99

Hell of a perfectionist. #99

ghost commented Jun 5, 2014

ariccio commented Jun 17, 2014

Hell of a perfectionist. #99

Are you sure you want to change the base?

Hell of a perfectionist. #99

Conversation

ghost commented Jun 5, 2014

ariccio commented Jun 17, 2014