-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: add challenge 49 #763
Conversation
bbe524c
to
fcbab22
Compare
fcbab22
to
2d6dcf3
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't know if @tomalaforge wants to focus much on RxJS much in the future, as RxJS becoming optional seems to be inevitable, but this is a nice callback to past RxJS challenges I've seen.
This repo is a great resource for RxJS challenges.
The deployment failed because the authors json file is missing?
This is a super nice challenge. I love it 😍 And when I have more time, I will try to start with some signal challenges. |
Actually, I looked into this and Angular is in a weird place. Most of the community is not adopting signals or even standalone components yet. See Academind state of Angular 2024. Async/await can be used in Angular (See this YouTube video) and its usage should only grow after zoneless hits. |
5470a73
to
8dc7946
Compare
Yes I know, and the weird place is not over yet. I think the time angular gets more stable will take more than a year. We will see what's the future holds. but for now, let's do challenges on rxjs. But I agree with you, if rxjs become optional, it will become less and less used. Because people will not bother learn it. It's too hard to understand. |
|
||
Here the prototype made by Lucie: | ||
|
||
![prototype gif](../../../../../../docs/src/assets/rxjs/49/prototype.gif) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The build fail, because the path is wrong.
try npm run doc:dev before pushing to test that the documentation site is launching correctly
@alcaidio Can you rebase it and correct the path of the image so I can merge it tomorrow ? |
8dc7946
to
a9c6d06
Compare
Sorry @tomalaforge I wasn't available, but I see you've merged thank you! |
Here's another challenge ready for the week after ^^ for rxjs this time.
(Need to merge #759 before this one)
Looking forward to your feedback.