Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

cdc: fix old value config glitch when changefeeds with different settings connect to one region (#9515) #9565

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 28, 2021

Conversation

ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor

@ti-srebot ti-srebot commented Jan 25, 2021

cherry-pick #9515 to release-4.0
You can switch your code base to this Pull Request by using git-extras:

# In tikv repo:
git pr https://github.com/tikv/tikv/pull/9565

After apply modifications, you can push your change to this PR via:

git push [email protected]:ti-srebot/tikv.git pr/9565:release-4.0-927e36f952f8

What problem does this PR solve?

Problem Summary:
When two TiCDC changefeeds connect to the same region, but one changefeed requires old value but the other doesn't, the one that doesn't need old value still receives old value.

What is changed and how it works?

What's Changed: Now we record the old value setting in each Downstream and filters the old value appropriately before sinking the events.

Related changes

  • Need to cherry-pick to the release branch

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test

Release note

  • Fix old value config glitch when changefeeds with different settings connect to one region

@ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-all-tests

@ti-srebot ti-srebot added component/CDC Component: Change Data Capture first-time-contributor Indicates that the PR was contributed by an external member and is a first-time contributor. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. type/cherry-pick Type: PR - Cherry pick labels Jan 25, 2021
@ti-srebot ti-srebot requested a review from 5kbpers January 25, 2021 14:36
@ti-srebot ti-srebot added this to the v4.0.11 milestone Jan 25, 2021
@ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor Author

@liuzix please accept the invitation then you can push to the cherry-pick pull requests.
https://github.com/ti-srebot/tikv/invitations

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 25, 2021
@liuzix
Copy link
Contributor

liuzix commented Jan 26, 2021

/run-all-tests

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 26, 2021
Signed-off-by: Zixiong Liu <[email protected]>
@liuzix liuzix force-pushed the release-4.0-927e36f952f8 branch from 2250c9a to f629c06 Compare January 27, 2021 03:05
Signed-off-by: Zixiong Liu <[email protected]>
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Jan 27, 2021
@liuzix
Copy link
Contributor

liuzix commented Jan 27, 2021

/cc @leoppro

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot requested a review from zier-one January 27, 2021 13:55
@zier-one
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • 5kbpers
  • leoppro

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by writing /lgtm in a comment.
Reviewer can cancel approval by writing /lgtm cancel in a comment.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Jan 28, 2021
@liuzix
Copy link
Contributor

liuzix commented Jan 28, 2021

/run-all-tests

@NingLin-P
Copy link
Member

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

@NingLin-P: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests:

/run-all-tests

You only need to trigger /merge once, and if the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

If you have any questions about the PR merge process, please refer to pr process.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: 6f7fecf

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Jan 28, 2021
@NingLin-P
Copy link
Member

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

@NingLin-P: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests:

/run-all-tests

You only need to trigger /merge once, and if the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

If you have any questions about the PR merge process, please refer to pr process.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot merged commit 56576a4 into tikv:release-4.0 Jan 28, 2021
gengliqi pushed a commit to gengliqi/tikv that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2021
…ings connect to one region (tikv#9515) (tikv#9565)

cherry-pick tikv#9515 to release-4.0
You can switch your code base to this Pull Request by using [git-extras](https://github.com/tj/git-extras):
```bash
# In tikv repo:
git pr tikv#9565
```

After apply modifications, you can push your change to this PR via:
```bash
git push [email protected]:ti-srebot/tikv.git pr/9565:release-4.0-927e36f952f8
```

---

<!--
Thank you for contributing to TiKV!

If you haven't already, please read TiKV's [CONTRIBUTING](https://github.com/tikv/tikv/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md) document.

If you're unsure about anything, just ask; somebody should be along to answer within a day or two.

PR Title Format:
1. module [, module2, module3]: what's changed
2. *: what's changed

If you want to open the **Challenge Program** pull request, please use the following template:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/tikv/.github/master/.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/challenge-program.md
You can use it with query parameters: https://github.com/tikv/tikv/compare/master...${you branch}?template=challenge-program.md
-->

### What problem does this PR solve?

Problem Summary:
When two TiCDC changefeeds connect to the same region, but one changefeed requires old value but the other doesn't, the one that doesn't need old value still receives old value.

### What is changed and how it works?

What's Changed: Now we record the old value setting in each `Downstream` and filters the old value appropriately before sinking the events. 

### Related changes

- Need to cherry-pick to the release branch

### Check List <!--REMOVE the items that are not applicable-->

Tests <!-- At least one of them must be included. -->

- Unit test


### Release note <!-- bugfixes or new feature need a release note -->
- Fix old value config glitch when changefeeds with different settings connect to one region
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
component/CDC Component: Change Data Capture first-time-contributor Indicates that the PR was contributed by an external member and is a first-time contributor. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. type/cherry-pick Type: PR - Cherry pick
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants