Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add documentation for node_pools #331

Closed

Conversation

neelesh9795
Copy link
Contributor

@neelesh9795 neelesh9795 commented Nov 18, 2019

Fixes #45

mmontan and others added 30 commits October 4, 2019 15:21
The PR adds a new "safer" GKE module. The module includes hardening
suggestions from multiple sources.
The PR adds a new "safer" GKE module. The module includes hardening
suggestions from multiple sources.
The PR adds a new "safer" GKE module. The module includes hardening
suggestions from multiple sources.
| min_count | Minimum number of nodes in the NodePool. Must be >=0 and <= max_count. Should be used when autoscaling is true | 1 | Optional |
| name | The name of the node pool | | Required |
| node_count | The number of nodes in the nodepool when autoscaling is false. Otherwise defaults to 1 | | Required (when autoscaling is false) |
| node_locations | The list of zones in which the cluster's nodes are located. Nodes must be in the region of their regional cluster or in the same region as their cluster's zone for zonal clusters | " " | Optional |
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is only available on beta clusters, please make sure to only include beta features inside beta conditionals: https://github.com/terraform-google-modules/terraform-google-kubernetes-engine/blob/master/autogen/cluster.tf.tmpl#L321

Copy link
Contributor

@morgante morgante left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@neelesh9795 Please rebase on master. It looks like you merged or otherwise polluted your history incorrectly, because the diff is now extremely noisy.

@neelesh9795
Copy link
Contributor Author

Opened a new PR #368 .

@neelesh9795 neelesh9795 closed this Dec 6, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Improve documentation of node_pools variable