-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update config.js: tls.rejectUnauthorized false by default (for selfsigned certificates) #275
Conversation
@@ -119,6 +119,12 @@ config.smtp = { | |||
pass: 'xyz' | |||
} | |||
*/ | |||
, | |||
tls: { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should the new option be document in some .md? (not sure to which level of deatil we are describing configuration in .mds... to be checked)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Doc was updated.
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ The following table shows the environment variables available for Perseo configu | |||
| PERSEO_SMTP_SECURE | `true` if SSL should be used with the SMTP server | | |||
| PERSEO_SMTP_AUTH_USER | Authentication data, the username | | |||
| PERSEO_SMTP_AUTH_PASS | Authentication data, the password for the user | | |||
| PERSEO_SMTP_TLS_REJECTUNAUTHORIZED | Reject if unauthorized security is found (i.e. selfsigned certificates). Default is false. | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
FYI @cesarjorgemartinez a new env var is being created by this PR. Take it into account in ansible, etc.
NTC (informative)
CHANGES_NEXT_RELEASE
Outdated
@@ -1 +1,2 @@ | |||
- Using precise dependencies (~=) in packages.json | |||
- Provide default value (false) for tls.rejectUnauthorized config option |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this PR related with #272? To mention the issue number in that case in the CNR line...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's a part for this issue, pending ignoreTLS/requireTLS
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
No description provided.