Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Simplify automated stress test #2407

Conversation

hansieodendaal
Copy link
Contributor

Description

  • Simplified the automated stress test so that it will also automatically perform any required coin split beforehand. If not enough large valued UTXOs are available for the coin split, it will create what is possible and let the user know afterwards what the status is, without performing the stress test.
  • Improved user feedback during initial phases of the test.

Motivation and Context

Too much user involvement was still required to perform an automated stress test.

How Has This Been Tested?

Tested in 2x base nodes running Windows

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Feature refactor (No new feature or functional changes, but performance or technical debt improvements)
  • New Tests
  • Documentation

Checklist:

  • I'm merging against the development branch.
  • I ran cargo-fmt --all before pushing.
  • I ran cargo test successfully before submitting my PR.
  • I have squashed my commits into a single commit.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.

Simplified the automated stress test so that it will also automatically
perform any required coin split beforehand. If not enough large valued
UTXOs are available for the coin split, it will create what is possible
and let the user know afterwards what the status is, without performing
the stress test.
@hansieodendaal hansieodendaal force-pushed the ho_simplify_stress_test branch from df173fc to 2b886df Compare November 1, 2020 07:48
@stringhandler stringhandler merged commit 69d6f5d into tari-project:development Nov 2, 2020
@hansieodendaal hansieodendaal deleted the ho_simplify_stress_test branch November 2, 2020 12:45
stringhandler added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 24, 2020
Major changes since v0.6.0
---
- [#2431](#2431) Database refactor to remove checkpoints and more efficient calculation of MMR roots
- [#2352](#2352) Add DNS seed support in base node

Minor changes since v0.6.0
---
- [#2448](#2448) Add OpenSSL to Windows install, runtime
- [#2434](#2434) Add supervisord setup notes
- [#2439](#2439) Provide initial sync status to merge mining proxy
- [#2377](#2377) Message malleability detect and ban
- [#2447](#2447) Fix for xmrig powershell script
- [#2440](#2440) Stagenet Setup Guide Corrections
- [#2444](#2444) DHT connectivity waits for comms connectivity before starting
- [#2427](#2427) Update merge mining runtime, README, Win install
- [#2420](#2420) Show base node chain tip and sync status in the console wallet
- [#2419](#2419) Add optional fee_per_gram field to console wallet Send Tx form
- [#2421](#2421) Fix QR code rendering in the console wallet
- [#2423](#2423) Plumb in the balance in the console wallet
- [#2415](#2415) Prevent loop in peer sync by storing all peers attempted
- [#2383](#2383) Implement daemon-mode in tari_base_node
- [#2407](#2407) Simplify automated stress test
- [#2397](#2397) Fix preset config files
- [#2400](#2400) Implement wallet base node service
- [#2403](#2403) Add exclusive file locks to Wallet, Chain and Peer db’s
- [#2408](#2408) Fix wallet conversion error for a valid tx status
- [#2356](#2356) Combine validation code to use same function in pruned and archive mode.
- [#2371](#2371) Add configurable BN service request timeouts
- [#2430](#2430) Implement entry and persistence of custom base node in console wallet
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants