Fix forgotten break in switch statement #2

Without the break statement, the execution would continue through the subsequent case clauses until it encountered a break, executing `checkArgument` calls meant for `REIMBURSEMENT_MAX_AMOUNT`. More specifically, the bug would cause a failed check in the case where `inputValueAsCoin.value <= 200000000` is false.
sqrrm · May 10, 2020 · a381cb2 · a381cb2
1 parent 58db561
commit a381cb2
Showing 1 changed file with 1 addition and 0 deletions.
diff --git a/core/src/main/java/bisq/core/dao/governance/proposal/param/ChangeParamValidator.java b/core/src/main/java/bisq/core/dao/governance/proposal/param/ChangeParamValidator.java
@@ -144,6 +144,7 @@ private void validateBsqValue(Coin currentParamValueAsCoin, Coin inputValueAsCoi
             case REIMBURSEMENT_MIN_AMOUNT:
                 checkArgument(inputValueAsCoin.value >= Restrictions.getMinNonDustOutput().value,
                         Res.get("validation.amountBelowDust", Restrictions.getMinNonDustOutput().value));
+                break;
             case COMPENSATION_REQUEST_MAX_AMOUNT:
             case REIMBURSEMENT_MAX_AMOUNT:
                 checkArgument(inputValueAsCoin.value >= Restrictions.getMinNonDustOutput().value,