Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Backport PR #1906 on branch v3.1.x (unpin tox < 4) #1907

Conversation

meeseeksmachine
Copy link

Backport PR #1906: unpin tox < 4

@lumberbot-app lumberbot-app bot added this to the 3.1.2 milestone Dec 8, 2022
@lumberbot-app lumberbot-app bot added 💤backport-v3.1.x on-merge: backport to v3.1.x no-changelog-entry-needed changelog bot directive testing trivial Only needs one approval instead of two labels Dec 8, 2022
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 8, 2022

Codecov Report

Base: 87.86% // Head: 87.86% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (3bd7695) compared to base (ace3f89).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           v3.1.x    #1907   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   87.86%   87.86%           
=======================================
  Files          95       95           
  Lines       10220    10220           
=======================================
  Hits         8980     8980           
  Misses       1240     1240           

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@pllim pllim merged commit 4ec73ee into spacetelescope:v3.1.x Dec 8, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
no-changelog-entry-needed changelog bot directive testing trivial Only needs one approval instead of two 💤backport-v3.1.x on-merge: backport to v3.1.x
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants