[VLAN test] Add VLAN test #375

tieguoevan · 2017-12-02T07:38:37Z

lguohan · 2017-12-05T11:24:05Z

ansible/roles/test/tasks/vlan_configure.yml

+- debug: var=vlan_intf_list
+
+- name: Flush all IP addresses on the LAGs
+  shell: cfgmgr intf del {{ (item.addr ~ "/" ~ item.mask)|ipaddr()|upper() }} dev {{ item.attachto }}


cfgmgr is not checked in. any plan to do this?

lguohan

We do not know how to run this test since the cfgmgr is not checked-in. Is there any plan to integrate cfgmgr into the sonic-utilities first?

tieguoevan · 2017-12-06T07:42:43Z

I have replace cfgmgr to vlan command introduced by sonic-net/sonic-utilities#151. Please take a look at. Thank you.

tieguoevan · 2017-12-06T09:38:04Z

ansible/roles/test/tasks/vlan_configure.yml

+    - "{{ minigraph_portchannel_interfaces }}"
+  become: true
+
+- name: Delete all IP addresses on the LAGs in config DB


This is a workaround since there is no command line to do both configure interface IP and write to configDB now. Is there any plan to support this?

We plan to support IP and Lag configuration though configDb in next release March.

In reply to: 155185549 [](ancestors = 155185549)

tieguoevan · 2017-12-07T01:27:01Z

ansible/roles/test/files/ptftests/vlan_test.py

+                                                                 dst_mac, self.dataplane.get_mac(0, target["port_index"]),
+                                                                 src_ip, target["remote_ip"], 63)
+
+        # Test case #5


The Test case 5 tests ping to CPU and verifies reply from CPU.

keboliu · 2017-12-07T03:32:16Z

One general question may not relate to the code but need to clarify.
How about the requirement to the fanout switch for these newly added cases?
In the test plan mentioned QinQ need to be configured on the fanout switch, could you elaborate it?

tieguoevan · 2017-12-07T03:57:32Z

Hi @keboliu,
QinQ is the only requirement for the fanout switch.
I think different vectors' devices have different configuration for QinQ. For us, we use a H3C switch as our fanout switch and enable QinQ by simply enabling it on every port connecting to the DUT according to its configuration guide

keboliu · 2017-12-07T07:24:06Z

ansible/roles/test/tasks/vlantb.yml

+#-----------------------------------------
+- name: Clean up Vlan test configuration on the testbed
+  include: vlan_cleanup.yml
+  tags: vlan_cleanup


suggest adding using log analyzer to analyze the errors in the log as part of the test as ACL test and Everflow test did, by this could make these test cases more complete.

Thank you kebo, LogAnalyzer will make the test case more complete. But I think it's better for me to add LogAnalyzer later after the test check in due to the time factor.

keboliu · 2017-12-07T07:36:29Z

ansible/roles/test/tasks/vlan_configure.yml

+  shell: config save -y
+  become: true
+
+- name: Reboot is required for config_db.json change


could this reboot be avoided by using "config reload config_db.json" to flush and reload the new configuration?

keboliu · 2017-12-07T07:48:13Z

ansible/roles/test/tasks/vlan_cleanup.yml

+  shell: mv /etc/sonic/config_db_bak.json /etc/sonic/config_db.json
+  become: true
+
+- name: Reboot is required for config_db.json change


Same question as previous one, is this reboot avoidable by using "config reload config_db_back.json"?

lguohan · 2017-12-07T22:58:06Z

@tieguoevan, can you provide command line how to run this test in README.test.md?

lguohan · 2017-12-08T22:17:04Z

ansible/roles/test/files/ptftests/vlan_test.py

+
+    #--------------------------------------------------------------------------
+    def build_icmp_packet(self, vlan_id, 
+                          src_mac="00:22:00:00:00:02", dst_mac="00:22:00:00:00:01", 


where does this dst_mac get populated the in the DUT switch. How does the switch know how to forward this packet?

If dst_mac is not specified, an unknown unicast ICMP package is constructed by default. "00:22:00:00:00:01" is unknown for switch unless a coincidence, switch need to flood this packet in the VLAN.

since your purpose is to broadcast the packet, why not use broadcast mac in this case? the behavior of unknown unicast mac can be changed.

lguohan · 2017-12-08T22:45:56Z

@tieguoevan, did you modify the arp_responder to support new format?

root@ce4c4380a07c:~# more /tmp/from_t1.json 
{"eth4.200": ["192.168.200.4"], "eth0.200": ["192.168.200.0"], "eth1.100": ["192.168.100.1"], "eth16.100": ["192.168.100.16"], "eth4": ["192.168.100.4"], "eth16": ["192.168.200.16"], "eth1": ["192.168.200.1"], "eth0": ["192.168
.100.0"]}

tieguoevan · 2017-12-08T23:58:22Z

I think arp_responder is support this format. What error message have you encountered?

lguohan · 2017-12-09T01:41:55Z

ansible/roles/test/files/ptftests/vlan_test.py

+                    self.verify_icmp_packets_from_specified_port(target["port_index"], 
+                                                                 target["vlan_id"] if target["vlan_id"] != target["pvid"] else 0,
+                                                                 dst_mac, self.dataplane.get_mac(0, target["port_index"]),
+                                                                 src_ip, target["peer_ip"], 63)


port 16 is part of lag, the packet can go to either port 16 or port 17. Here you only check port 16 which is not enough.

01:36:21.910 root : INFO : Send tagged(200) packet from 4... 01:36:21.910 root : INFO : 7c:fe:90:5e:6b:04 -> 90:b1:1c:f4:a8:53, 192.168.200.4 -> 192.168.100.16 01:36:21.912 root : INFO : Verify packet from port 16

The test only supports t0 testbed type now. The t0 testbed type should only suppprt one member in LAG? If t1-lag is supported in the future, here need to be modified indeed.

another issue.

05:14:27.515 root : INFO : Test case #4 starting ... 05:14:27.524 root : INFO : Send tagged(200) packet from 4... 05:14:27.525 root : INFO : 7c:fe:90:5e:6b:04 -> 90:b1:1c:f4:a8:53, 192.168.200.4 -> 192.168.100.4 05:14:27.528 root : INFO : Verify packet from port 4 05:14:27.543 root : INFO : Send tagged(200) packet from 4... 05:14:27.543 root : INFO : 7c:fe:90:5e:6b:04 -> 90:b1:1c:f4:a8:53, 192.168.200.4 -> 192.168.100.16 05:14:27.545 root : INFO : Verify packet from port 16 05:14:27.558 root : INFO : Send tagged(200) packet from 4... 05:14:27.559 root : INFO : 7c:fe:90:5e:6b:04 -> 90:b1:1c:f4:a8:53, 192.168.200.4 -> 192.168.100.0 05:14:27.562 root : INFO : Verify packet from port 0

The destination IP 192.168.100.0 is strange

lguohan · 2017-12-09T10:43:13Z

ansible/roles/test/files/ptftests/vlan_test.py

+        pass
+    #--------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+    def setUpArpResponder(self):


in order for the test to make, every port in the ptf conainer needs to have a different mac. That is not the setup by default, you need to run this script. Can you add in the test?

https://github.com/Azure/sonic-mgmt/blob/master/ansible/roles/test/files/helpers/change_mac.sh

lguohan · 2017-12-09T11:19:47Z

ansible/roles/test/files/ptftests/vlan_test.py

+    #--------------------------------------------------------------------------
+    def send_icmp_packet(self, vlan_port, vlan_id=0,
+                       src_mac="00:22:00:00:00:02", dst_mac="00:22:00:00:00:01", 
+                       src_ip="192.168.0.1", dst_ip="192.168.0.2", ttl=64):


you already have default paramaters in build_icmp_packet, can we avoid duplication here?

lguohan · 2017-12-09T11:19:55Z

ansible/roles/test/files/ptftests/vlan_test.py

+    #--------------------------------------------------------------------------
+    def verify_icmp_packets(self, vlan_port, vlan_id,
+                          src_mac="00:22:00:00:00:02", dst_mac="00:22:00:00:00:01", 
+                          src_ip="192.168.0.1", dst_ip="192.168.0.2", ttl=64):


you already have default paramaters in build_icmp_packet, can we avoid duplication here?

lguohan · 2017-12-09T11:29:58Z

ansible/roles/test/files/ptftests/vlan_test.py

+                    masked_exp_pkt = Mask(exp_pkt)
+                    masked_exp_pkt.set_do_not_care_scapy(scapy.IP, "id")
+
+                    verify_packets(self, masked_exp_pkt, list(str(src_port)))


can you print similiar log here?

self.log("Verify packet from ports ???")

I do not find the verify log in test 5.

lguohan · 2017-12-09T11:34:14Z

ansible/roles/test/tasks/vlan_configure.yml

+- name: Configure IP addresses on VLAN interfaces in Config DB
+  shell: docker exec -i database redis-cli -n 4 hset "VLAN_INTERFACE|Vlan{{ item.vlan_id }}|{{ item.ip }}" NULL NULL
+  with_items: "{{ vlan_intf_list }}"
+  become: true


all these steps seems complex, why not provide a configdb.json file we need here and just reload to the new configdb?

lguohan · 2017-12-09T11:35:33Z

ansible/roles/test/tasks/vlan_configure.yml

+  become: true
+
+- name: Configure IP addresses on VLAN interfaces in Config DB
+  shell: docker exec -i database redis-cli -n 4 hset "VLAN_INTERFACE|Vlan{{ item.vlan_id }}|{{ item.ip }}" NULL NULL


why do we need to config ip addr manually in previous task? isn't enough by just configuring the VLAN_INTERFACE in the configdb?

lguohan · 2017-12-09T11:37:39Z

ansible/roles/test/tasks/vlan_configure.yml

+  include_vars: '/tmp/vlan_info.yml'
+
+- debug: var=vlan_ports_list
+- debug: var=vlan_intf_list


can we move line 7-20 to vlantb.yml? I need those variables when I only run the vlan_test.yml

lguohan

as comments

keboliu · 2017-12-11T05:55:12Z

@tieguoevan besides enabling the QinQ configuration on the fanout switch ports which connected to the DUT, how about the fanout trunk port which connected to the root fanout? any extra configuration needed?

tieguoevan · 2017-12-11T11:42:40Z

Modified. Please have a look again. Thanks. @lguohan

tieguoevan · 2017-12-11T11:43:23Z

@keboliu no extra configuration needed for us.

interface deleted

keboliu · 2017-12-12T10:53:36Z

All cases passed on my local testbed.

* msft_github/master: [PFCWD]: Add Add support for t0 toplogy and arista fanout testbed (sonic-net#424) add orchagent process check before each test and sanity after each test (sonic-net#431) Move mem_check.sh into helpers/ directory to conform with location of other helper scripts (sonic-net#435) fix tests for t0-116 topology (sonic-net#430) Updated labinfo file with Arista fanout sku (sonic-net#429) add missing snmp testcases to top level snmp.yml; fixed wrong test file for neighbour test; change arp test comment more readable (sonic-net#428) Fix sku-sensors-data for 7060 (sonic-net#427) Fix port alias mapping for Arista-7050QX-32S (sonic-net#426) [Lag 2] Allow lacp timing tests to retry limited times until succeeded (sonic-net#403) [hwsku]: Add Accton-AS7716-32X (sonic-net#405) add generate minigrah using testbed_name option (sonic-net#425) Update README.testbed.md Create README.testbed.Example.md Update README.testbed.Config.md add missing test case name (sonic-net#417) fix typo when assign dscp_mode for decap test (sonic-net#418) [repeat harness] rework repeat harness and introduce test case continuous reboot (sonic-net#416) allow upgrade sonic via onie or sonic-to-sonic upgrade method (sonic-net#413) [topology]: Fix t1-64-lag topology device link base indices (sonic-net#414) Run sudo command with log_analyzer (sonic-net#415) [sonic tests] use host time instead of ansible time (sonic-net#410) [upgrade_sonic]: Fix the hostname in the wait_for condition (sonic-net#411) [Test cases] clean up some test cases changes and enabling more tests (sonic-net#409) add restart_swss (sonic-net#412) [sonic test] introduce a repeat harness (sonic-net#402) Update README.test.md [bgp_speaker]: always clean up test environment after it finishes (sonic-net#406) [vlan]: add vlan test to test by testname (sonic-net#408) [bug]: convert the interface from unicode to string (sonic-net#407) [VLAN test] Add VLAN test (sonic-net#375) [vm]: change the default Front plane port to 4 instead of 8 (sonic-net#404) Update README.testbed.Setup.md [acl]: Adopt tests with acl-loader to t0 and t1-lag topo. (sonic-net#370) add connect_topo command for testbed-cli.sh (sonic-net#398) [FIB, BGP speaker] fix t0-116 topology source port list (sonic-net#396) [bgp_speaker]: Specify VLAN IP route in case LPM to other nexthop (sonic-net#394) [sensor]: Change sensor labels for Arista 7050 and 7260 (sonic-net#395) Delete Arista DPMs sensors data (sonic-net#393) [bug]: change maximum packet to 9114 to send in the mtu test (sonic-net#391)

chenkelly · 2019-12-13T07:18:42Z

Hi all
Please advise us your suggestion. Thanks very much.
There are two members in every port channel for t0-116 topology, but only select first trunk member (port_index) to run vlan test cases in PTF VM according to VLAN ports information which generated by vlan_info.j2 file.
It is strange because we cannot suppose that testing DUT always select fixed trunk member for egress forwarding after applying load balance algorithm which is depend on ASIC design.
PTF determine VLAN test is failed if testing DUT select second member of port channel as egress port.

Please see our test results belows.

Deploy minigraph.
DUT create four PortChannel0001~0004, two members in every PortChannel.

   root@as8000:~# show int p
   Flags: A - active, I - inactive, Up - up, Dw - Down, N/A - not available,
          S - selected, D - deselected, * - not synced
     No.  Team Dev         Protocol     Ports
   -----  ---------------  -----------  ---------------------------
    0001  PortChannel0001  LACP(A)(Up)  Ethernet25(S) Ethernet24(S)
    0002  PortChannel0002  LACP(A)(Up)  Ethernet27(S) Ethernet26(S)
    0003  PortChannel0003  LACP(A)(Up)  Ethernet29(S) Ethernet28(S)
    0004  PortChannel0004  LACP(A)(Up)  Ethernet30(S) Ethernet31(S)

Run VLAN test case.
For PortChannel0001, port_index is first member "24" and it is added to VLAN 100 with untagged member and VLAN 200 with tagged member.
For PortChannel0003, port_index is first member "28" and it is added to VLAN 200 with untagged member and VLAN 100 with tagged member.
When PTF run case 1, send untagged packet from 24 and expect port 28 receive tagged packet.
Ethernet24 of DUT receives untagged packets and then forward to other VLAN member (PortChannel0003) of VLAN 100.
If ASCI select member Ethernet29 to send out tagged VLAN 100 packets, the test is failed finially.

    sonic@8c173b24ac3b:~/sonic-mgmt/ansible$ cat /tmp/vlan_info.yml
    ---     

            

    vlan_ports_list:
      - dev: PortChannel0001
        port_index: 24
        pvid: '100'
        permit_vlanid:
          '100':
            peer_ip: '192.168.100.97'
            remote_ip: '100.1.1.97'
          '200':
            peer_ip: '192.168.200.97'
            remote_ip: '200.1.1.97'
      - dev: PortChannel0003
        port_index: 28
        pvid: '200'
        permit_vlanid:
          '100':
            peer_ip: '192.168.100.91'
            remote_ip: '100.1.1.91'
          '200':
            peer_ip: '192.168.200.91'
            remote_ip: '200.1.1.91'     

            

    vlan_intf_list:
      - vlan_id: '100'
        ip: '192.168.100.1/24'
      - vlan_id: '200'
        ip: '192.168.200.1/24'      

            

    ...

    root@01432d0008ea:~# cat /tmp/vlan_test.log
    02:16:05.806  root      : INFO    : ++++++++ Fri Dec 13 02:16:05 2019 ++++++++
    02:16:05.886  scapy.runtime: WARNING : No route found for IPv6 destination :: (no default route?)
    02:16:05.920  root      : INFO    : VXLAN support found in Scapy
    02:16:05.921  root      : INFO    : ERSPAN support found in Scapy
    02:16:05.922  root      : INFO    : GENEVE support found in Scapy
    02:16:05.922  root      : INFO    : MPLS support found in Scapy
    02:16:05.923  root      : INFO    : NVGRE support found in Scapy
    02:16:06.019  root      : INFO    : Importing platform: remote
    02:16:06.021  root      : INFO    : port map: {(0, 86): 'eth86', (0, 53): 'eth53', (0, 20): 'eth20', (0, 89): 'eth89', (0, 56): 'eth56', (0, 109): 'eth109', (0, 7): 'eth7', (0, 76): 'eth76', (0, 43): 'eth43', (0, 10): 'eth10', (0, 94): 'eth94', (0, 61): 'eth61', (0, 98): 'eth98', (0, 28): 'eth28', (0, 65): 'eth65', (0, 32): 'eth32', (0, 15): 'eth15', (0, 116): 'eth116', (0, 83): 'eth83', (0, 50): 'eth50', (0, 103): 'eth103', (0, 17): 'eth17', (0, 70): 'eth70', (0, 37): 'eth37', (0, 106): 'eth106', (0, 4): 'eth4', (0, 73): 'eth73', (0, 40): 'eth40', (0, 55): 'eth55', (0, 22): 'eth22', (0, 91): 'eth91', (0, 58): 'eth58', (0, 111): 'eth111', (0, 25): 'eth25', (0, 78): 'eth78', (0, 45): 'eth45', (0, 12): 'eth12', (0, 113): 'eth113', (0, 80): 'eth80', (0, 63): 'eth63', (0, 100): 'eth100', (0, 30): 'eth30', (0, 67): 'eth67', (0, 34): 'eth34', (0, 1): 'eth1', (0, 118): 'eth118', (0, 85): 'eth85', (0, 52): 'eth52', (0, 19): 'eth19', (0, 88): 'eth88', (0, 39): 'eth39', (0, 108): 'eth108', (0, 6): 'eth6', (0, 75): 'eth75', (0, 42): 'eth42', (0, 9): 'eth9', (0, 93): 'eth93', (0, 60): 'eth60', (0, 97): 'eth97', (0, 27): 'eth27', (0, 64): 'eth64', (0, 47): 'eth47', (0, 14): 'eth14', (0, 115): 'eth115', (0, 82): 'eth82', (0, 49): 'eth49', (0, 102): 'eth102', (0, 16): 'eth16', (0, 69): 'eth69', (0, 36): 'eth36', (0, 105): 'eth105', (0, 3): 'eth3', (0, 72): 'eth72', (0, 87): 'eth87', (0, 54): 'eth54', (0, 21): 'eth21', (0, 90): 'eth90', (0, 57): 'eth57', (0, 110): 'eth110', (0, 24): 'eth24', (0, 77): 'eth77', (0, 44): 'eth44', (0, 11): 'eth11', (0, 112): 'eth112', (0, 95): 'eth95', (0, 62): 'eth62', (0, 99): 'eth99', (0, 29): 'eth29', (0, 66): 'eth66', (0, 33): 'eth33', (0, 0): 'eth0', (0, 117): 'eth117', (0, 84): 'eth84', (0, 51): 'eth51', (0, 18): 'eth18', (0, 71): 'eth71', (0, 38): 'eth38', (0, 107): 'eth107', (0, 5): 'eth5', (0, 74): 'eth74', (0, 41): 'eth41', (0, 8): 'eth8', (0, 23): 'eth23', (0, 92): 'eth92', (0, 59): 'eth59', (0, 96): 'eth96', (0, 26): 'eth26', (0, 79): 'eth79', (0, 46): 'eth46', (0, 13): 'eth13', (0, 114): 'eth114', (0, 81): 'eth81', (0, 48): 'eth48', (0, 101): 'eth101', (0, 31): 'eth31', (0, 68): 'eth68', (0, 35): 'eth35', (0, 104): 'eth104', (0, 2): 'eth2', (0, 119): 'eth119'}
    02:16:06.021  root      : INFO    : Autogen random seed: 14127903
    02:16:06.080  root      : INFO    : *** TEST RUN START: Fri Dec 13 02:16:06 2019
    02:16:06.082  root      : INFO    : Create VLAN intf
    02:16:06.103  root      : INFO    : Start arp_responder
    02:16:07.296  root      : INFO    : VLAN test starting ...
    02:16:07.296  root      : INFO    : Test case #1 starting ...
    02:16:07.301  root      : INFO    : Send untagged packet from 24 ...
    02:16:07.301  root      : INFO    : 00:22:00:00:00:02 192.168.0.1 -> ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 192.168.0.2
    02:16:08.169  root      : INFO    : Verify untagged packets from ports [] tagged packets from ports [28]
    02:16:10.182  root      : INFO    : VLAN test ending ...
    02:16:10.182  root      : INFO    : Stop arp_responder
    02:16:10.436  root      : INFO    : Delete VLAN intf
    02:16:10.510  root      : INFO    : *** TEST RUN END  : Fri Dec 13 02:16:10 2019
    02:16:10.511  dataplane : INFO    : Thread exit

[VLAN test] Add VLAN test

99fe5ee

lguohan requested a review from stcheng December 5, 2017 11:16

lguohan reviewed Dec 5, 2017

View reviewed changes

lguohan requested changes Dec 5, 2017

View reviewed changes

[VLAN test] use new VLAN command instead of cfgmgr

94a9f04

tieguoevan commented Dec 6, 2017

View reviewed changes

tieguoevan commented Dec 7, 2017

View reviewed changes

keboliu reviewed Dec 7, 2017

View reviewed changes

lguohan mentioned this pull request Dec 7, 2017

[submodules]: update sonic-swss and sonic-swss-common sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#1215

Merged

tieguoevan added 2 commits December 8, 2017 11:37

[VLAN test] Add command line how to run test in README.test.md

52d56bc

[VLAN test] fix VLAN test wrong format in README.test.md

f3f5aa6

lguohan reviewed Dec 8, 2017

View reviewed changes

lguohan reviewed Dec 9, 2017

View reviewed changes

lguohan requested changes Dec 9, 2017

View reviewed changes

[VLAN test] modify according to the review

3fde360

[VLAN test] start arp_responder after interface created and stop before

28f4469

interface deleted

tieguoevan and others added 3 commits December 13, 2017 15:27

[VLAN test] Fix peer_ip may conflict with VLAN interface IP

6c97f0b

Merge branch 'master' into add-vlan-tests

a1005fd

Merge branch 'master' into add-vlan-tests

38d2a69

lguohan merged commit 3821db2 into sonic-net:master Dec 30, 2017

neethajohn mentioned this pull request Aug 12, 2020

[test_vlan] Fix test_vlan #2090

Merged

3 tasks

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

[VLAN test] Add VLAN test #375

[VLAN test] Add VLAN test #375

tieguoevan commented Dec 2, 2017

lguohan Dec 5, 2017

lguohan left a comment

tieguoevan commented Dec 6, 2017

tieguoevan Dec 6, 2017 •

edited

Loading

lguohan Dec 7, 2017

tieguoevan Dec 7, 2017

keboliu commented Dec 7, 2017

tieguoevan commented Dec 7, 2017

keboliu Dec 7, 2017

tieguoevan Dec 8, 2017

keboliu Dec 7, 2017

keboliu Dec 7, 2017

lguohan commented Dec 7, 2017

lguohan Dec 8, 2017

tieguoevan Dec 8, 2017

lguohan Dec 9, 2017

lguohan commented Dec 8, 2017

tieguoevan commented Dec 8, 2017

lguohan Dec 9, 2017

tieguoevan Dec 9, 2017

lguohan Dec 9, 2017 •

edited

Loading

lguohan Dec 9, 2017

lguohan Dec 9, 2017

lguohan Dec 9, 2017

lguohan Dec 9, 2017

lguohan Dec 9, 2017

lguohan Dec 9, 2017

lguohan Dec 9, 2017

lguohan left a comment

keboliu commented Dec 11, 2017

tieguoevan commented Dec 11, 2017

tieguoevan commented Dec 11, 2017

keboliu commented Dec 12, 2017 •

edited

Loading

chenkelly commented Dec 13, 2019 •

edited

Loading

[VLAN test] Add VLAN test #375

[VLAN test] Add VLAN test #375

Conversation

tieguoevan commented Dec 2, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

lguohan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

tieguoevan commented Dec 6, 2017

tieguoevan Dec 6, 2017 • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

keboliu commented Dec 7, 2017

tieguoevan commented Dec 7, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

lguohan commented Dec 7, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

lguohan commented Dec 8, 2017

tieguoevan commented Dec 8, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

lguohan Dec 9, 2017 • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

lguohan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

keboliu commented Dec 11, 2017

tieguoevan commented Dec 11, 2017

tieguoevan commented Dec 11, 2017

keboliu commented Dec 12, 2017 • edited Loading

chenkelly commented Dec 13, 2019 • edited Loading

tieguoevan Dec 6, 2017 •

edited

Loading

lguohan Dec 9, 2017 •

edited

Loading

keboliu commented Dec 12, 2017 •

edited

Loading

chenkelly commented Dec 13, 2019 •

edited

Loading