Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Modified tests/ipfwd/test_mtu.py testcase to run on T2 topology #2860

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Mar 3, 2021

Conversation

oxygen980
Copy link
Contributor

Description of PR

Modified tests/ipfwd/test_mtu.py testcase to run on multi-dut and for T2 topology.

Summary:
Fixes # (issue)

Type of change

  • Bug fix
  • Testbed and Framework(new/improvement)
  • Test case(new/improvement)

Approach

What is the motivation for this PR?

Need the capability to run ipfwd/test_mtu.py testcase on T2 topology.

How did you do it?

ipfwd/test_mtu.py testcase is modified to run on multi-dut by taking dut related information from mg_facts and added support to run T2 topology.

How did you verify/test it?

Ran testcase on T2 topology.

Any platform specific information?

Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?

Documentation

@oxygen980 oxygen980 changed the title Modified testcase to run on T2 topology Modified tests/ipfwd/test_mtu.py testcase to run on T2 topology Jan 25, 2021
tests/ipfwd/test_mtu.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@yxieca yxieca requested a review from a team January 26, 2021 23:54
tests/ipfwd/test_mtu.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@oxygen980 oxygen980 force-pushed the ipfwd_converted_to_t2 branch from 6d44717 to 63469af Compare February 1, 2021 18:33
@oxygen980
Copy link
Contributor Author

Please review.

tests/ipfwd/test_mtu.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@oxygen980 oxygen980 force-pushed the ipfwd_converted_to_t2 branch from 63469af to 63bd856 Compare February 8, 2021 19:30
@lgtm-com
Copy link

lgtm-com bot commented Feb 8, 2021

This pull request introduces 1 alert when merging 63bd85610eb31f36514dd6ab7603efc7820c9ede into 1e70c8e - view on LGTM.com

new alerts:

  • 1 for Unused import

@oxygen980
Copy link
Contributor Author

/AzurePipelines run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Commenter does not have sufficient privileges for PR 2860 in repo Azure/sonic-mgmt

@oxygen980
Copy link
Contributor Author

retest vs image please

@oxygen980 oxygen980 force-pushed the ipfwd_converted_to_t2 branch from 6b52ab7 to 4095a66 Compare February 10, 2021 19:55
@oxygen980 oxygen980 requested a review from wangxin February 17, 2021 21:17
@oxygen980
Copy link
Contributor Author

@wangxin Could you please review the changes ?

tests/ipfwd/conftest.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@oxygen980 oxygen980 force-pushed the ipfwd_converted_to_t2 branch from 4095a66 to 58f1a4a Compare March 2, 2021 23:38
@wangxin wangxin merged commit 5f18513 into sonic-net:master Mar 3, 2021
liat-grozovik pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2023
Added missed configuration in the calculation of headroom.
Related configuration: #2860

- What is the motivation for this PR?
Fix failed tests on setups with 800G:

tests/qos/test_buffer.py::test_port_auto_neg
tests/qos/test_buffer.py::test_lossless_pg[6]
tests/qos/test_buffer.py::test_lossless_pg[3-4]

- How did you do it?
Added missed config

- How did you verify/test it?
Executed failed tests.
Now they are passing

Signed-off-by: AntonHryshchuk <[email protected]>
AharonMalkin pushed a commit to AharonMalkin/sonic-mgmt that referenced this pull request Jan 25, 2024
Added missed configuration in the calculation of headroom.
Related configuration: sonic-net#2860

- What is the motivation for this PR?
Fix failed tests on setups with 800G:

tests/qos/test_buffer.py::test_port_auto_neg
tests/qos/test_buffer.py::test_lossless_pg[6]
tests/qos/test_buffer.py::test_lossless_pg[3-4]

- How did you do it?
Added missed config

- How did you verify/test it?
Executed failed tests.
Now they are passing

Signed-off-by: AntonHryshchuk <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants