Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

JN.1.67.1+S:S60P (41 Seqs, >10 regions) #1980

Closed
xz-keg opened this issue Sep 3, 2024 · 22 comments
Closed

JN.1.67.1+S:S60P (41 Seqs, >10 regions) #1980

xz-keg opened this issue Sep 3, 2024 · 22 comments
Labels
S:60 S:456 To be proposed Green light for proposal

Comments

@xz-keg
Copy link
Contributor

xz-keg commented Sep 3, 2024

JN.1.67.1+T21740C(S:S60P)

This S60P+F456L combo also appears in XDV.1.1, LF.9 and cov-lineages/pango-designation#2745, despite not fast, it is still circulating with very few additional spikes.

GISAID query: T21740C, G26660T, T22928C,-10834,-T177C
No. of seqs: 20(New Zealand 1 Germany 1 Singapore 1 USA 1 China 16(6 different provinces))

First: EPI_ISL_19264833, China-Henan, 2024-5-16
Latest: EPI_ISL_19330211, China-Gansu, 2024-8-8

usher
image

@xz-keg xz-keg changed the title JN.1.67.1+S:S60P (20 Seqs, 5 countries) JN.1.67.1+S:S60P (28 Seqs, 5 countries) Sep 7, 2024
@xz-keg xz-keg changed the title JN.1.67.1+S:S60P (28 Seqs, 5 countries) JN.1.67.1+S:S60P (31 Seqs, 5 countries) Sep 13, 2024
@xz-keg xz-keg changed the title JN.1.67.1+S:S60P (31 Seqs, 5 countries) JN.1.67.1+S:S60P (34 Seqs, 5 countries) Sep 18, 2024
@FedeGueli FedeGueli changed the title JN.1.67.1+S:S60P (34 Seqs, 5 countries) JN.1.67.1+S:S60P (34 Seqs, 6 countries) Sep 18, 2024
@FedeGueli
Copy link

6countries , please take Taiwan as separate country

@xz-keg
Copy link
Contributor Author

xz-keg commented Sep 18, 2024

6countries , please take Taiwan as separate country

Well, I don't separate out regions like Puerto Rico, Taiwan,Hong Kong, Guam, Canary Islands, French Guiana, Greenland etc. They are closely linked but also somehow different with their original countries.

I think "region" may be a better description in epi sense. And better separate out Chinese provinces, United State States, Indian pradeshes (which I'm actually doing in model data preparing). Currently number of countries is usually over-represented for European countries.

@xz-keg
Copy link
Contributor Author

xz-keg commented Sep 18, 2024

@FedeGueli I think I'll use "regions" in future proposals. This better describes broadness of variants, which the "number of country" want to achieve.
Regions may include
1: Chinese provinces
2: USA states and overseas territories like Guam/Puerto Rico
3: India Pradesh
4: UK countries (England, Scotland etc.)
5: Overseas territories for other countries like Greenland, French Guiana etc.

For imported cases they will be regarded as their original regions and their destination regions won't be counted.

@xz-keg
Copy link
Contributor Author

xz-keg commented Sep 18, 2024

For this one, it is in Gansu,Shanxi,Liaoning,Henan, Hubei, Taiwan, Germany, New Zealand, Singapore, GA, TX, total 11 regions.

@xz-keg xz-keg changed the title JN.1.67.1+S:S60P (34 Seqs, 6 countries) JN.1.67.1+S:S60P (34 Seqs, 11 regions) Sep 18, 2024
@FedeGueli
Copy link

FedeGueli commented Sep 18, 2024

For this one, it is in Gansu,Shanxi,Liaoning,Henan, Hubei, Taiwan, Germany, New Zealand, Singapore, GA, TX, total 11 regions.

mm you should use then also the same for Canadian States, Brazilian states , Germany federal regions, i think it is a mess.
we should keep this mirrored to Gisaid and Gisaid has the divisions i mentioned above, so please don't mess things further
(Wales,England, Scotland are all under united kingdom together).
Personally talking we are here in these repos with our little and very limited lives to try to help and benefit human kind as a whole, independently from any nationalism, as Nations far to be expression of people sovereignity are the common tools used by elites to force people under their powers and don not represent any identity that is stuck into people hearts and souls and are instead way to oppress those identities and souls.

@FedeGueli
Copy link

Said that when you propose anything you can do as you want but as moderator please don't change the usual way to identify countries. If there are issues with that write to Gisaid explaining why that should be changed.

@xz-keg
Copy link
Contributor Author

xz-keg commented Sep 18, 2024

mm you should use then also the same for Canadian States, Brazilian states , Germany federal regions, i think it is a mess. we should keep this mirrored to Gisaid and Gisaid has the divisions i mentioned above, so please don't mess things further (Wales,England, Scotland are all under united kingdom together). Personally talking we are here in these repos with our little and very limited lives to try to help and benefit human kind as a whole, independently from any nationalism, as Nations far to be expression of people sovereignity are the common tools used by elites to force people under their powers and don not represent any identity that is stuck into people hearts and souls and are instead way to oppress those identities and souls.

By number of countries, we are actually looking for "number of separate seq collection sources", that's why regions shall be a better estimate,

@xz-keg
Copy link
Contributor Author

xz-keg commented Sep 19, 2024

we should keep this mirrored to Gisaid and Gisaid has the divisions i mentioned above, so please don't mess things further (Wales,England, Scotland are all under united kingdom together).

Many non-country regions are separated out on GISAID. All Chinese provinces including Hong Kong and Taiwan, UK countries and overseas territories of Canary Islands, Puerto Rico, French Guiana etc. are all separated out.

If you want to keep the term "country" maybe we shall follow UN membership.

@FedeGueli
Copy link

we should keep this mirrored to Gisaid and Gisaid has the divisions i mentioned above, so please don't mess things further (Wales,England, Scotland are all under united kingdom together).

Many non-country regions are separated out on GISAID. All Chinese provinces including Hong Kong and Taiwan, UK countries and overseas territories of Canary Islands, Puerto Rico, French Guiana etc. are all separated out.

If you want to keep the term "country" maybe we shall follow UN membership.

no, if you search China you find those regions but not Taiwan , so please again keep things as there as moderator , as proposer you can do what you prefer

@FedeGueli
Copy link

So if something is separated on Gisaid keep it separated

@corneliusroemer i would like your view.

@FedeGueli
Copy link

we should keep this mirrored to Gisaid and Gisaid has the divisions i mentioned above, so please don't mess things further (Wales,England, Scotland are all under united kingdom together).

Many non-country regions are separated out on GISAID. All Chinese provinces including Hong Kong and Taiwan, UK countries and overseas territories of Canary Islands, Puerto Rico, French Guiana etc. are all separated out.

If you want to keep the term "country" maybe we shall follow UN membership.

and btw i do not give a fuck about nations or countries, call it regions the onluy thing that i m interested in is that the different issues are comparable and the count updated by everyone in the same way so if you want to call it regions call it as you want also "places " it is ok for me, earth is one it is all about conventions and wars so not inherent our mission here.

@xz-keg
Copy link
Contributor Author

xz-keg commented Sep 21, 2024

and btw i do not give a fuck about nations or countries, call it regions the onluy thing that i m interested in is that the different issues are comparable and the count updated by everyone in the same way so if you want to call it regions call it as you want also "places " it is ok for me, earth is one it is all about conventions and wars so not inherent our mission here.

We are doing quite silly debate. I actually don't know why we use number of country while GISAID actually does not. It separates country and their semi-independent territories like Puerto Rico, Greenland etc. And actually some Puerto Rico seqs are submitted by USA and some Canary Island seqs are submitted by Spain, what a mess! It is just for convenience to show how wide a lineage spread.

@FedeGueli
Copy link

and btw i do not give a fuck about nations or countries, call it regions the onluy thing that i m interested in is that the different issues are comparable and the count updated by everyone in the same way so if you want to call it regions call it as you want also "places " it is ok for me, earth is one it is all about conventions and wars so not inherent our mission here.

We are doing quite silly debate. I actually don't know why we use number of country while GISAID actually does not. It separates country and their semi-independent territories like Puerto Rico, Greenland etc. And actually some Puerto Rico seqs are submitted by USA and some Canary Island seqs are submitted by Spain, what a mess! It is just for convenience to show how wide a lineage spread.

Agree you started that.

@xz-keg xz-keg changed the title JN.1.67.1+S:S60P (34 Seqs, 11 regions) JN.1.67.1+S:S60P (35 Seqs, 11 regions) Sep 21, 2024
@xz-keg xz-keg changed the title JN.1.67.1+S:S60P (35 Seqs, 11 regions) JN.1.67.1+S:S60P (36 Seqs, 11 regions) Sep 26, 2024
@xz-keg xz-keg changed the title JN.1.67.1+S:S60P (36 Seqs, 11 regions) JN.1.67.1+S:S60P (39 Seqs, >10 regions) Oct 1, 2024
@Mydtlwn
Copy link

Mydtlwn commented Oct 4, 2024

I generally use the term 'region' rather than 'country' because there is inconsistency in the recognition of countries across different nations or regions of the world. Using or not using the word 'country' may offend any of these parties. From the perspective of a rigorous scientific worker, it is also more appropriate to say 'region' rather than 'country.

@FedeGueli
Copy link

I generally use the term 'region' rather than 'country' because there is inconsistency in the recognition of countries across different nations or regions of the world. Using or not using the word 'country' may offend any of these parties. From the perspective of a rigorous scientific worker, it is also more appropriate to say 'region' rather than 'country.

yeah we are using Places now, my point was exactly that. Not offending people but no care about governments.

@DailyCovidCases
Copy link

Tree now:
usher
Screenshot (260)
Propose this branch?

@FedeGueli
Copy link

lets wait next Chinese batches

@xz-keg xz-keg changed the title JN.1.67.1+S:S60P (39 Seqs, >10 regions) JN.1.67.1+S:S60P (40 Seqs, >10 regions) Oct 17, 2024
@DailyCovidCases
Copy link

@FedeGueli Propose this branch?

@FedeGueli FedeGueli changed the title JN.1.67.1+S:S60P (40 Seqs, >10 regions) JN.1.67.1+S:S60P (41 Seqs, >10 regions) Oct 20, 2024
@FedeGueli FedeGueli added To be proposed Green light for proposal and removed Rapid review needed labels Oct 20, 2024
@FedeGueli
Copy link

@FedeGueli Propose this branch?

thx i will propose when it reaches 50

@xz-keg
Copy link
Contributor Author

xz-keg commented Nov 2, 2024

not detected in any recent Chinese batches, close down.

@xz-keg xz-keg closed this as completed Nov 2, 2024
@Over-There-Is
Copy link

Sichuan+5

@FedeGueli
Copy link

FedeGueli commented Nov 23, 2024

Sichuan+5

No one recent though

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S:60 S:456 To be proposed Green light for proposal
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants