KP.1.1+S:F59S,S:T572I (175 seqs,>20 countries)

[Memorablea]

KP.1.1(S:F456L,S:R346T)+S:F59S,S:T572I
GISAID Query:C2488T, C19172T, T21738C, C23277T, C26735T
(suggested query: C2488T, C19172T, T21738C,C23277T finds 17)

EPI_ISL ID:
EPI_ISL_19181923, EPI_ISL_19182161, EPI_ISL_19182250,
EPI_ISL_19183300, EPI_ISL_19186883-19186884, EPI_ISL_19192229,
EPI_ISL_19192783, EPI_ISL_19208041, EPI_ISL_19210331,
EPI_ISL_19210346, EPI_ISL_19210627

UshER Tree:
https://nextstrain.org/fetch/genome.ucsc.edu/trash/ct/singleSubtreeAuspice_genome_1678_953e80.json?f_userOrOld=uploaded%20sample

Thanks for @FedeGueli and @aviczhl2 in #1632

[FedeGueli]

I ve added a query tha finds 17 samples: C2488T, C19172T, T21738C,C23277T

[Memorablea]

I ve added a query tha finds 17 samples: C2488T, C19172T, T21738C,C23277T

Update UshER tree
https://nextstrain.org/fetch/genome.ucsc.edu/trash/ct/singleSubtreeAuspice_genome_1678_953e80.json?f_userOrOld=uploaded%20sample

Please add the S: 27 tag @FedeGueli

[FedeGueli]

I ve added a query tha finds 17 samples: C2488T, C19172T, T21738C,C23277T

Update UshER tree https://nextstrain.org/fetch/genome.ucsc.edu/trash/ct/singleSubtreeAuspice_genome_1678_953e80.json?f_userOrOld=uploaded%20sample

Please add the S: 27 tag @FedeGueli

S:27 is tricky especially from Singapore they read many times the deletion this way, have you checked the nucleotide sequence with the deletion?

[Memorablea]

USA+1 18

[Memorablea]

USA+1 Ireland+1 20now

[FedeGueli]

pls propose it

[Memorablea]

pls propose it

If I don't request it from the Pango repository, it can still be specified. isn't it?

[Mydtlwn]

Yes, it will still be designated, but there is a difference in meaning between proposing and not proposing. For some historically significant strains, it will allow more people to better understand them. Meanwhile, the variant with two convergent mutations is more significant in that repository.

[Memorablea]

Yes, it will still be designated, but there is a difference in meaning between proposing and not proposing. For some historically significant strains, it will allow more people to better understand them. Meanwhile, the variant with two convergent mutations is more significant in that repository.

to cov-lineages/pango-designation#2676

[FedeGueli]

Yes, it will still be designated, but there is a difference in meaning between proposing and not proposing. For some historically significant strains, it will allow more people to better understand them. Meanwhile, the variant with two convergent mutations is more significant in that repository.

to cov-lineages/pango-designation#2676

thank you

[Memorablea]

34

[Memorablea]

51

[xz-keg]

Designated MU.1 via cov-lineages/pango-designation@7fb8081

[FedeGueli]

@corneliusroemer this should not be a descendant of KP.1.1.5

https://nextstrain.org/fetch/genome-test.gi.ucsc.edu/trash/ct/subtreeAuspice1_genome_test_31bc6_e279b0.json?c=gt-nuc_2488,13280,19172&gmax=20172&gmin=1488&label=id:node_7059816