-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 98
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Designate MU.1 (KP.1.1.5.1, S:T572I)
- Loading branch information
1 parent
43d7733
commit 7fb8081
Showing
3 changed files
with
212 additions
and
0 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
7fb8081
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
From sars-cov-2-variants/lineage-proposals#1646 and #2676
7fb8081
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ping @corneliusroemer this should not be a descendant of KP.1.1.5 but a sibling branch of it:
https://nextstrain.org/fetch/genome-test.gi.ucsc.edu/trash/ct/subtreeAuspice1_genome_test_31bc6_e279b0.json?c=gt-nuc_2488,13280,19172&gmax=20172&gmin=1488&label=id:node_7059816
7fb8081
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No Fede, check again ;) Usher is wrong here
7fb8081
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There's just a single sequence that splits the branch - I don't trust a single sequence ;)
Could just be that this is a recombinant or artefact: France/IDF-RELAB-IPP04652/2024|EPI_ISL_19035144|2024-03-14
7fb8081
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
also #2676
7fb8081
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thx Cornelius! Yeah i ve noticed that, but 59S being very convergent it would have not surprised me to emerge two times independently, while this branch being arounf 50% of parental lineage it seemed a bit too big for a non spike defined branch, but these are just speculations and your choice is right