Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add paragraph to ControlFlow docs to menion it works with the ? operator (#88715) #89446

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 31, 2021
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
7 changes: 7 additions & 0 deletions library/core/src/ops/control_flow.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -7,6 +7,10 @@ use crate::{convert, ops};
/// Having the enum makes it clearer -- no more wondering "wait, what did `false`
/// mean again?" -- and allows including a value.
///
/// Similar to [`Option`] and [`Result`], this enum can be used with the `?` operator
/// to return immediately if the [`Break`] variant is present or otherwise continue normally
/// with the value inside the [`Continue`] variant.
///
/// # Examples
///
/// Early-exiting from [`Iterator::try_for_each`]:
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -46,6 +50,9 @@ use crate::{convert, ops};
/// }
/// }
/// ```
///
/// [`Break`]: ControlFlow::Break
/// [`Continue`]: ControlFlow::Continue
#[stable(feature = "control_flow_enum_type", since = "1.55.0")]
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq)]
pub enum ControlFlow<B, C = ()> {
Expand Down