-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 6 pull requests #84517
Closed
Closed
Rollup of 6 pull requests #84517
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This is a quick-fix for an ICE in `tabs_in_doc_comments`. The problem was that we we're indexing into possibly multi-byte characters, such as '位'. More specifically `get_chunks_of_tabs` was returning indices into multi-byte characters. Those were passed on to a `Span` creation that then caused the ICE. This fix makes sure that we don't return indices that point inside a multi-byte character. *However*, we are still iterating over unicode codepoints, not grapheme clusters. So a seemingly single character like y̆ , which actually consists of two codepoints, will probably still cause incorrect spans in the output.
Only lint when `into_iter` is an implementation of `IntoIterator` Minor cleanups
Fix `macro_use_import` ICE fixes: rust-lang#7015 changelog: Fix `macro_use_import` ICE
…ffen Invalid null usage v2 This is continuation of rust-lang#6192 after inactivity. I plan to move paths into the compiler as diagnostic items after this is merged. fixes rust-lang#1703 changelog: none
This still applies the lint, and also adds a structured suggestion to rename it.
Use `register_renamed` instead of `register_removed` for uplifted lints This still applies the lint, and also adds a structured suggestion to rename it. changelog: Use `register_renamed` instead of `register_removed` for lints uplifted to rustc
…fn, r=flip1995 Remove `debug_assert` from `panic_in_result_fn` I couldn't find any documentation on `debug_assert` that should be remove. In my humble opinion, I would also like to argue that `todo` and `unreachable` shouldn't trigger this lint? Related: rust-lang/rust-clippy#6082 r? `@flip1995` changelog: Change `panic_in_result_fn` to ignore `debug_assert` and co macros
…arth Fix false-positive `debug_assert` in `panic` This fixes a false-positive in `clippy::panic` when `debug_assert` is used with a message. Fixes rust-lang/rust-clippy#7062. changelog: Fix false-positive in `panic` when `debug_assert` is used with a message
…0, r=giraffate Fix FP in `single_component_path_imports` lint Fix FP in `single_component_path_imports` lint when the import is reused with `self`, like in `use self::module`. Fixes rust-lang#5210 changelog: none
Deprecate `filter_map` Since rust-lang#6591, `filter_map` does not even lint `filter().map()`. The cases that are still linted make no sense IMO. So this just removes/deprecates it. changelog: Deprecate `filter_map` lint Closes rust-lang#3424 Fixes rust-lang#7050
…ishearth Add a note on the issue rust-lang#5953 Hello, I thought it would be better to have a note and warning about this issue considering it introduced an UB in the past even with the "Search on Github" feature. --- changelog: Add a note on the issue rust-lang#5953 to the known problems section.
Introduce `is_lang_ctor` changelog: none Replaces `is_some_ctor` and `is_ok_ctor`. Removes many path usages.
Rustup r? `@ghost` changelog: none
… clean::Module It can be calculated on-demand even without a TyCtxt. This also changed `from_item_kind` to take a whole item, which avoids having to add more and more parameters.
This was missed a while ago when support for proc-macro attributes was first added.
…ode, r=pnkfelix Implement a lint that highlights all moves larger than a configured limit Tracking issue: rust-lang#83518 [MCP 420](rust-lang/compiler-team#420) still ~blazing~ in progress r? ```@pnkfelix``` The main open issue I see with this minimal impl of the feature is that the lint is immediately "stable" (so it can be named on stable), even if it is never executed on stable. I don't think we have the concept of unstable lint names or hiding lint names without an active feature gate, so that would be a bigger change.
…es, r=varkor various const parameter defaults improvements Actually resolve names in const parameter defaults, fixing `struct Foo<const N: usize = { usize::MAX }>`. --- Split generic parameter ban rib for types and consts, allowing ```rust #![feature(const_generics_defaults)] struct Q; struct Foo<T = Q, const Q: usize = 3>(T); ``` --- Remove the type/const ordering restriction if `const_generics_defaults` is active, even if `const_generics` is not. allowing us to stabilize and test const param defaults separately. --- Check well formedness of const parameter defaults, eagerly emitting an error for `struct Foo<const N: usize = { 0 - 1 }>` --- Do not forbid const parameters in param defaults, allowing `struct Foo<const N: usize, T = [u8; N]>(T)` and `struct Foo<const N: usize, const M: usize = N>`. Note that this should not change anything which is stabilized, as on stable, type parameters must be in front of const parameters, which means that type parameter defaults are only allowed if no const parameters exist. We still forbid generic parameters inside of const param types. r? `````````@varkor````````` `````````@petrochenkov`````````
…oli-obk further split up const_fn feature flag This continues the work on splitting up `const_fn` into separate feature flags: * `const_fn_trait_bound` for `const fn` with trait bounds * `const_fn_unsize` for unsizing coercions in `const fn` (looks like only `dyn` unsizing is still guarded here) I don't know if there are even any things left that `const_fn` guards... at least libcore and liballoc do not need it any more. ``@oli-obk`` are you currently able to do reviews?
Update Clippy r? ```@Manishearth``` Biweekly Clippy update.
rustdoc: Remove unnecessary `is_crate` field from doctree::Module and clean::Module It can be calculated on-demand even without a TyCtxt. This also changed `json::conversions::from_item_kind` to take a whole item, which avoids having to add more and more parameters. Helps with rust-lang#76382. r? ```@camelid```
rustdoc: Get rid of `clean::TypeKind` It does exactly the same thing as ItemType.
@bors r+ p=6 rollup=never |
📌 Commit 3276103 has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
label
Apr 24, 2021
⌛ Testing commit 3276103 with merge 7fe78989cc547c3ce995d29eb63aee6416597ea8... |
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
and removed
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
labels
Apr 24, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
is_crate
field from doctree::Module and clean::Module #84460 (rustdoc: Remove unnecessaryis_crate
field from doctree::Module and clean::Module)clean::TypeKind
#84464 (rustdoc: Get rid ofclean::TypeKind
)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup