Rollup of 8 pull requests #74724
Merged
Rollup of 8 pull requests #74724
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- increasing the readability of `Condvar` - simplify the interface to the libos HermitCore
out of highlight_if_we_can_match_hir_ty_from_argument, which is then renamed
The check of the `exp` parameter seems useless if we execute the while-loop more than once.
The original implementation of `pow` function using one more comparison if the `exp==0` and may break the pipeline of the cpu, which may generate a slower code.
The performance gap between the old and the new implementation may be small, but IMO, at least the newer one looks more beautiful.
---
bench prog:
```
extern crate test;
($a:expr)=>{let time=std::time::Instant::now();{$a;}print!("{:?} ",time.elapsed())};
($a:expr,$b:literal)=>{let time=std::time::Instant::now();let mut a=0;for _ in 0..$b{a^=$a;}print!("{:?} {} ",time.elapsed(),a)}
}
pub fn pow_rust(x:i64, mut exp: u32) -> i64 {
let mut base = x;
let mut acc = 1;
while exp > 1 {
if (exp & 1) == 1 {
acc = acc * base;
}
exp /= 2;
base = base * base;
}
if exp == 1 {
acc = acc * base;
}
acc
}
pub fn pow_new(x:i64, mut exp: u32) -> i64 {
if exp==0{
1
}else{
let mut base = x;
let mut acc = 1;
while exp > 1 {
if (exp & 1) == 1 {
acc = acc * base;
}
exp >>= 1;
base = base * base;
}
acc * base
}
}
fn main(){
let a=2i64;
let b=1_u32;
println!();
timing!(test::black_box(a).pow(test::black_box(b)),100000000);
timing!(pow_new(test::black_box(a),test::black_box(b)),100000000);
timing!(pow_rust(test::black_box(a),test::black_box(b)),100000000);
println!();
timing!(test::black_box(a).pow(test::black_box(b)),100000000);
timing!(pow_new(test::black_box(a),test::black_box(b)),100000000);
timing!(pow_rust(test::black_box(a),test::black_box(b)),100000000);
println!();
timing!(test::black_box(a).pow(test::black_box(b)),100000000);
timing!(pow_new(test::black_box(a),test::black_box(b)),100000000);
timing!(pow_rust(test::black_box(a),test::black_box(b)),100000000);
println!();
timing!(test::black_box(a).pow(test::black_box(b)),100000000);
timing!(pow_new(test::black_box(a),test::black_box(b)),100000000);
timing!(pow_rust(test::black_box(a),test::black_box(b)),100000000);
println!();
timing!(test::black_box(a).pow(test::black_box(b)),100000000);
timing!(pow_new(test::black_box(a),test::black_box(b)),100000000);
timing!(pow_rust(test::black_box(a),test::black_box(b)),100000000);
println!();
timing!(test::black_box(a).pow(test::black_box(b)),100000000);
timing!(pow_new(test::black_box(a),test::black_box(b)),100000000);
timing!(pow_rust(test::black_box(a),test::black_box(b)),100000000);
println!();
timing!(test::black_box(a).pow(test::black_box(b)),100000000);
timing!(pow_new(test::black_box(a),test::black_box(b)),100000000);
timing!(pow_rust(test::black_box(a),test::black_box(b)),100000000);
println!();
timing!(test::black_box(a).pow(test::black_box(b)),100000000);
timing!(pow_new(test::black_box(a),test::black_box(b)),100000000);
timing!(pow_rust(test::black_box(a),test::black_box(b)),100000000);
println!();
}
```
bench in my laptop:
```
neutron@Neutron:/me/rust$ rc commit.rs
rustc commit.rs && ./commit
3.978419716s 0 4.079765171s 0 3.964630622s 0
3.997127013s 0 4.260304804s 0 3.997638211s 0
3.963195544s 0 4.11657718s 0 4.176054164s 0
3.830128579s 0 3.980396122s 0 3.937258567s 0
3.986055948s 0 4.127804162s 0 4.018943411s 0
4.185568857s 0 4.217512517s 0 3.98313603s 0
3.863018225s 0 4.030447988s 0 3.694878237s 0
4.206987927s 0 4.137608047s 0 4.115564664s 0
neutron@Neutron:/me/rust$ rc commit.rs -O
rustc commit.rs -O && ./commit
162.111993ms 0 165.107125ms 0 166.26924ms 0
175.20479ms 0 205.062565ms 0 176.278791ms 0
174.408975ms 0 166.526899ms 0 201.857604ms 0
146.190062ms 0 168.592821ms 0 154.61411ms 0
199.678912ms 0 168.411598ms 0 162.129996ms 0
147.420765ms 0 209.759326ms 0 154.807907ms 0
165.507134ms 0 188.476239ms 0 157.351524ms 0
121.320123ms 0 126.401229ms 0 114.86428ms 0
```
delete an unnecessary semicolon...
Sorry for the typo.
delete trailing whitespace
Sorry, too..
Sorry for the missing...
I checked all the implementations, and finally found that there is one function that does not check whether `exp == 0`
add extra tests
add extra tests.
finished adding the extra tests to prevent further typo
add pow(2) to negative exp
add whitespace.
add whitespace
add whitespace
delete extra line
mismatched traits were previously referred to as types
revise RwLock for HermitCore - current version is derived from the wasm implementation - increasing the readability of `Condvar` - simplify the interface to the libos
Rearrange the pipeline of `pow` to gain efficiency
The check of the `exp` parameter seems useless if we execute the while-loop more than once.
The original implementation of `pow` function using one more comparison if the `exp==0` and may break the pipeline of the cpu, which may generate a slower code.
The performance gap between the old and the new implementation may be small, but IMO, at least the newer one looks more beautiful.
---
bench prog:
```
#![feature(test)]
extern crate test;
#[macro_export]macro_rules! timing{
($a:expr)=>{let time=std::time::Instant::now();{$a;}print!("{:?} ",time.elapsed())};
($a:expr,$b:literal)=>{let time=std::time::Instant::now();let mut a=0;for _ in 0..$b{a^=$a;}print!("{:?} {} ",time.elapsed(),a)}
}
#[inline]
pub fn pow_rust(x:i64, mut exp: u32) -> i64 {
let mut base = x;
let mut acc = 1;
while exp > 1 {
if (exp & 1) == 1 {
acc = acc * base;
}
exp /= 2;
base = base * base;
}
if exp == 1 {
acc = acc * base;
}
acc
}
#[inline]
pub fn pow_new(x:i64, mut exp: u32) -> i64 {
if exp==0{
1
}else{
let mut base = x;
let mut acc = 1;
while exp > 1 {
if (exp & 1) == 1 {
acc = acc * base;
}
exp >>= 1;
base = base * base;
}
acc * base
}
}
fn main(){
let a=2i64;
let b=1_u32;
println!();
timing!(test::black_box(a).pow(test::black_box(b)),100000000);
timing!(pow_new(test::black_box(a),test::black_box(b)),100000000);
timing!(pow_rust(test::black_box(a),test::black_box(b)),100000000);
println!();
timing!(test::black_box(a).pow(test::black_box(b)),100000000);
timing!(pow_new(test::black_box(a),test::black_box(b)),100000000);
timing!(pow_rust(test::black_box(a),test::black_box(b)),100000000);
println!();
timing!(test::black_box(a).pow(test::black_box(b)),100000000);
timing!(pow_new(test::black_box(a),test::black_box(b)),100000000);
timing!(pow_rust(test::black_box(a),test::black_box(b)),100000000);
println!();
timing!(test::black_box(a).pow(test::black_box(b)),100000000);
timing!(pow_new(test::black_box(a),test::black_box(b)),100000000);
timing!(pow_rust(test::black_box(a),test::black_box(b)),100000000);
println!();
timing!(test::black_box(a).pow(test::black_box(b)),100000000);
timing!(pow_new(test::black_box(a),test::black_box(b)),100000000);
timing!(pow_rust(test::black_box(a),test::black_box(b)),100000000);
println!();
timing!(test::black_box(a).pow(test::black_box(b)),100000000);
timing!(pow_new(test::black_box(a),test::black_box(b)),100000000);
timing!(pow_rust(test::black_box(a),test::black_box(b)),100000000);
println!();
timing!(test::black_box(a).pow(test::black_box(b)),100000000);
timing!(pow_new(test::black_box(a),test::black_box(b)),100000000);
timing!(pow_rust(test::black_box(a),test::black_box(b)),100000000);
println!();
timing!(test::black_box(a).pow(test::black_box(b)),100000000);
timing!(pow_new(test::black_box(a),test::black_box(b)),100000000);
timing!(pow_rust(test::black_box(a),test::black_box(b)),100000000);
println!();
}
```
bench in my laptop:
```
neutron@Neutron:/me/rust$ rc commit.rs
rustc commit.rs && ./commit
3.978419716s 0 4.079765171s 0 3.964630622s 0
3.997127013s 0 4.260304804s 0 3.997638211s 0
3.963195544s 0 4.11657718s 0 4.176054164s 0
3.830128579s 0 3.980396122s 0 3.937258567s 0
3.986055948s 0 4.127804162s 0 4.018943411s 0
4.185568857s 0 4.217512517s 0 3.98313603s 0
3.863018225s 0 4.030447988s 0 3.694878237s 0
4.206987927s 0 4.137608047s 0 4.115564664s 0
neutron@Neutron:/me/rust$ rc commit.rs -O
rustc commit.rs -O && ./commit
162.111993ms 0 165.107125ms 0 166.26924ms 0
175.20479ms 0 205.062565ms 0 176.278791ms 0
174.408975ms 0 166.526899ms 0 201.857604ms 0
146.190062ms 0 168.592821ms 0 154.61411ms 0
199.678912ms 0 168.411598ms 0 162.129996ms 0
147.420765ms 0 209.759326ms 0 154.807907ms 0
165.507134ms 0 188.476239ms 0 157.351524ms 0
121.320123ms 0 126.401229ms 0 114.86428ms 0
```
Optimize away BitAnd and BitOr when possible This PR lets `const_prop` optimize away `a | true == true` , `a & false == false` and `a * 0 = 0`. While I was writing this I've realized that constant propagation misses a lot of opportunities. For example: https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2018&gist=2a4b45e772f214210a36749b27223bb0 Constant propagation doesn't seem to... propagate constants, additionally the way constant propagation is currently setup makes it tricky to add cases like `a | false == a`. I tried to organize `eval_rvalue_with_identities` to make the pattern of the optimizations easier to see but it still obscurs what should be a simple peephole optmization. cc @oli-obk
Downgrade glibc to 2.11.1 for ppc, ppc64 and s390x As discussed in rust-lang#73782 I've tested these changes on rust 1.43.0 for all the specified archs and used the resulting binaries to bootstrap building rust 1.43.1. I've also shortly tested these changes on master on ppc64.
…r=estebank Refactor `region_name`: add `RegionNameHighlight` This PR does not change any diagnostics itself, rather it enables further code changes, but I would like to get approval for the refactoring first before making use of it. In `rustc_mir::borrow_check::diagnostics::region_name`, there is code that allows for, when giving a synthesized name like `'1` to an anonymous lifetime, pointing at e.g. the exact '`&`' that introduces the lifetime. This PR decouples that code from the specific case of arguments, adding a new enum `RegionNameHighlight`, enabling future changes to use it in other places. This allows: * We could change the other `AnonRegionFrom*` variants to use `RegionNameHighlight` to precisely point at where lifetimes are introduced in other locations when they have type annotations, e.g. a closure return `|...| -> &i32`. * Because of how async functions are lowered this affects async functions as well, see rust-lang#74072 * for rust-lang#74597, we could add a second, optional `RegionNameHighlight` to the `AnonRegionFromArgument` variant that highlights a lifetime in the return type of a function when, due to elision, this is the same as the argument lifetime. * in rust-lang#74497 (comment) I noticed that a diagnostic was trying to introduce a lifetime `'2` in the opaque type `impl std::future::Future`. The code for the case of arguments has [code to handle cases like this](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/bbebe7351fcd29af1eb9a35e315369b15887ea09/src/librustc_mir/borrow_check/diagnostics/region_name.rs#L365) but not the others. This refactoring would allow the same code path to handle this. * It might be appropriate to add another variant of `RegionNameHighlight` to say something like `lifetime '1 appears in the opaque type impl std::future::Future`. These are quite a few changes so I thought I would make sure the refactoring is OK before I start making changes that rely on it. :)
delay_span_bug instead of silent ignore This is a follow-up to rust-lang#74557. r? @pnkfelix
…=estebank fixed error reporting for mismatched traits mismatched traits were previously referred to as types closes rust-lang#72217
Add a system for creating diffs across multiple mir optimizations. r? @wesleywiser
|
📌 Commit 5d1d94e has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
|
⌛ Testing commit 5d1d94e with merge 0bf9b810517bb78ffd3273f9ae5ea664f9ae3e09... |
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions, checks-azure |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
powto gain efficiency #74367 (Rearrange the pipeline ofpowto gain efficiency)region_name: addRegionNameHighlight#74661 (Refactorregion_name: addRegionNameHighlight)Failed merges:
r? @ghost