-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 6 pull requests #61852
Closed
Closed
Rollup of 6 pull requests #61852
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This commit extends the work in rust-lang#61698 to get the `DefId` of const parameters from block that resolve to a const parameter (as well as const parameters directly, as it was previously).
When suggesting borrow, remove useless clones Fix rust-lang#61106.
note some safety concerns of raw-ptr-to-ref casts
…expr-count-sequel, r=varkor typeck: Fix ICE for blocks in repeat expr count. Fixes rust-lang#61336 (again). This PR fixes an ICE that occured when a block expression resolving to a const generic was used for the count of an array repeat expression. r? @varkor
…mbol-ops, r=petrochenkov Remove some unnecessary symbol interner ops * Don't gensym symbols that don't need to worry about colliding with other symbols * Use symbol constants instead of interning string literals in a few places. * Don't generate a module in `__register_diagnostic` r? @petrochenkov
type_alias_enum_variants: fix rust-lang#61801; allow a path pattern to infer Fix rust-lang#61801. Given a type-relative path pattern referring to an enum variant through a type alias, allow inferring the generic argument applied in the expectation set by the scrutinee of a `match` expression. Similar issues may exist for `let` statements but I don't know how to test for that since `PhantomData<T>` is necessary...) The gist of the problem here was that `resolve_ty_and_res_ufcs` was called twice which is apparently no good... It is possible that this PR is papering over some deeper problem, but that is beyond my knowledge of the compiler. r? @petrochenkov cc @eddyb @alexreg cc rust-lang#61682 cc rust-lang#49683
Change `...` to `..=` where applicable This is mainly to fix rust-lang#61816, but I decided to manually check a few thousand `...` throughout the code base to check for any other cases. I think I found a documentation bug in `src\libsyntax\ast.rs` where both `1..` and `1...` where mentioned. If there is internal support for both `1..` and `1..=` (that can exist before error handling gets to it), then I can add that back. There were some other cases that look like `// struct Closure<'l0...'li, T0...Tj, CK, CS, U0...Uk> {`, `// <P0 as Trait<P1...Pn>>::Foo: 'a`, and `assert!(min <= max, "discriminant range is {}...{}", min, max);`, but I am not sure if I should change those. There are a bunch of cases in the `/test/` directory that could be changed, but I presume I should just leave those be.
@bors r+ p=6 rollup=never |
📌 Commit 4b528fe has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
label
Jun 14, 2019
⌛ Testing commit 4b528fe with merge 1954863b424d3a4b31b0bce35fb8a413c13d9847... |
💔 Test failed - status-appveyor |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
and removed
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
labels
Jun 14, 2019
@bors treeclosed=100 |
@bors retry |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Jun 14, 2019
@bors p=200 |
⌛ Testing commit 4b528fe with merge 76fd2fa058e33048ded87b00eb132edcfa6da362... |
💔 Test failed - status-appveyor |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
and removed
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
labels
Jun 14, 2019
@bors treeclosed- |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
...
to..=
where applicable #61844 (Change...
to..=
where applicable)Failed merges:
r? @ghost