-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 10 pull requests #59550
Merged
Merged
Rollup of 10 pull requests #59550
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This commit removes the check that disallows the `#[non_exhaustive]` attribute from being placed on enum variants and removes the associated tests. Further, this commit lowers the visibility of enum variant constructors when the variant is marked as non-exhaustive.
This commit updates the unstable book and diagnostics to reflect that the `#[non_exhaustive]` attribute is now available for enum variants.
This commit adds support for non-exhaustive enum variants in rustdoc, extending the existing support for non-exhaustive enums and structs.
…unused attribute.
…es not flag them as unused.
Wrapped lines earlier such that it is more coherent with the rest of the text. Co-Authored-By: DevQps <[email protected]>
Removed duplicate line. Co-Authored-By: DevQps <[email protected]>
Calling `Read::read` or `Write::write` without checking the returned `usize` value is almost always an error. Example code in the documentation should demonstrate how to use the return value correctly. Otherwise, people might copy the example code thinking that it is okay to "fire and forget" these methods.
This was incorrectly copypasta'd from RepeatWith.
…, r=petrochenkov,QuietMisdreavus RFC 2008: Enum Variants Part of rust-lang#44109. See [Zulip topic](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/rfc-2008/near/132663140) for previous discussion. r? @petrochenkov cc @nikomatsakis
…rochenkov Recover from parse error in tuple syntax
…d, r=davidtwco Account for short-hand field syntax when suggesting borrow Fix rust-lang#52965.
…=alexcrichton Fix broken download link in the armhf-gnu image Thanks to @johnterickson for pointing this out! r? @alexcrichton
implement `AsRawFd` for stdio locks cc rust-lang/rfcs#2074.
…, r=petrochenkov Whitelist some rustc attrs These rustc attrs are used within libcore, and were causing failures when one mixed incremental compilation with bootstrapping (due to a default of `-D warnings` when bootstrapping). Fix rust-lang#59523 Fix rust-lang#59524 Cc rust-lang#58633
…ntril Improve the dbg! macro docs # Description As stated has been discussed in rust-lang#58383 the docs do not clearly state why it is useful to have the option to use `dbg!` in release builds as well. This PR should change that. closes rust-lang#58383
In doc examples, don't ignore read/write results Calling `Read::read` or `Write::write` without checking the returned `usize` value is almost always an error. Example code in the documentation should demonstrate how to use the return value correctly. Otherwise, people might copy the example code thinking that it is okay to "fire and forget" these methods.
…r=GuillaumeGomez rustdoc: collapse blanket impls in the same way as normal impls If the rustdoc setting _Auto-hide trait implementations documentation_ is activated (on by default), normal trait implementations are collapsed by default. Blanket impls on the other hand are not collapsed. I'm not sure whether this is intended, but considering that the blanket impls for `From`, `Into`, `TryFrom`, ... are on every type, it would reduce the documentation bloat if these would also be collapsed when the setting is active. (I'm not really familiar with the codebase and therefore just copied the code for the normal impl collapsing, but I could deduplicate it into a method, of course, too.)
Fix OnceWith docstring. This was incorrectly copypasta'd from RepeatWith.
@bors r+ p=10 |
📌 Commit 62a78c4 has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
label
Mar 30, 2019
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 30, 2019
Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - #59376 (RFC 2008: Enum Variants) - #59453 (Recover from parse error in tuple syntax) - #59455 (Account for short-hand field syntax when suggesting borrow) - #59499 (Fix broken download link in the armhf-gnu image) - #59512 (implement `AsRawFd` for stdio locks) - #59525 (Whitelist some rustc attrs) - #59528 (Improve the dbg! macro docs ) - #59532 (In doc examples, don't ignore read/write results) - #59534 (rustdoc: collapse blanket impls in the same way as normal impls) - #59537 (Fix OnceWith docstring.) Failed merges: r? @ghost
☀️ Test successful - checks-travis, status-appveyor |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors
This PR was explicitly merged by bors.
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
AsRawFd
for stdio locks #59512 (implementAsRawFd
for stdio locks)Failed merges:
r? @ghost