-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Spruce up the diagnostics of some early lints #125913
Merged
bors
merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:master
from
fmease:early-lints-spruce-up-some-diags
Jun 11, 2024
Merged
Spruce up the diagnostics of some early lints #125913
bors
merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:master
from
fmease:early-lints-spruce-up-some-diags
Jun 11, 2024
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
r? @Nadrieril rustbot has assigned @Nadrieril. Use |
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
labels
Jun 3, 2024
ty! @bors r+ |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Jun 10, 2024
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 11, 2024
…diags, r=Nadrieril Spruce up the diagnostics of some early lints Implement the various "*(note to myself) in a follow-up PR we should turn parts of this message into a subdiagnostic (help msg or even struct sugg)*" drive-by comments I left in rust-lang#124417 during my review. For context, before rust-lang#124417, only a few early lints touched/decorated/customized their diagnostic because the former API made it a bit awkward. Likely because of that, things that should've been subdiagnostics were just crammed into the primary message. This PR rectifies this.
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 11, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 3 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#125913 (Spruce up the diagnostics of some early lints) - rust-lang#126140 (Rename `std::fs::try_exists` to `std::fs::exists` and stabilize fs_try_exists) - rust-lang#126234 (Delegation: fix ICE on late diagnostics) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 11, 2024
Rollup of 5 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#125913 (Spruce up the diagnostics of some early lints) - rust-lang#126234 (Delegation: fix ICE on late diagnostics) - rust-lang#126253 (Simplify assert matchers in `run-make-support`) - rust-lang#126257 (Rename `needs-matching-clang` to `needs-force-clang-based-tests`) - rust-lang#126259 (reachable computation: clarify comments around consts) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 11, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#125913 - fmease:early-lints-spruce-up-some-diags, r=Nadrieril Spruce up the diagnostics of some early lints Implement the various "*(note to myself) in a follow-up PR we should turn parts of this message into a subdiagnostic (help msg or even struct sugg)*" drive-by comments I left in rust-lang#124417 during my review. For context, before rust-lang#124417, only a few early lints touched/decorated/customized their diagnostic because the former API made it a bit awkward. Likely because of that, things that should've been subdiagnostics were just crammed into the primary message. This PR rectifies this.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Implement the various "(note to myself) in a follow-up PR we should turn parts of this message into a subdiagnostic (help msg or even struct sugg)" drive-by comments I left in #124417 during my review.
For context, before #124417, only a few early lints touched/decorated/customized their diagnostic because the former API made it a bit awkward. Likely because of that, things that should've been subdiagnostics were just crammed into the primary message. This PR rectifies this.