-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rename needs-matching-clang
to needs-force-clang-based-tests
#126257
Conversation
This header is much more restrictive than its old name would suggest. As a result, most of the tests that use it don't actually run in any CI jobs.
Some changes occurred in src/tools/compiletest cc @jieyouxu This PR modifies cc @jieyouxu |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, the change looks reasonable. Would you like to update rustc-dev-guide about the renamed header, or would you like me to? In any case, I won't block this PR on that.
@bors r+ rollup |
Rollup of 5 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#125913 (Spruce up the diagnostics of some early lints) - rust-lang#126234 (Delegation: fix ICE on late diagnostics) - rust-lang#126253 (Simplify assert matchers in `run-make-support`) - rust-lang#126257 (Rename `needs-matching-clang` to `needs-force-clang-based-tests`) - rust-lang#126259 (reachable computation: clarify comments around consts) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Rollup merge of rust-lang#126257 - Zalathar:needs-matching-clang, r=jieyouxu Rename `needs-matching-clang` to `needs-force-clang-based-tests` This header is much more restrictive than its old name would suggest. As a result, most of the tests that use it don't actually run in any CI jobs. Mitigation for rust-lang#126180, though at some point we still need to go back fix the affected tests to actually run.
This header is much more restrictive than its old name would suggest. As a result, most of the tests that use it don't actually run in any CI jobs.
Mitigation for #126180, though at some point we still need to go back fix the affected tests to actually run.