Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

perf: Avoid an extra function call and object clone during event emission #1441

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 19, 2024

Conversation

eoghanmurray
Copy link
Contributor

See #1339 - perf: remove a nested function call and an object clone per event

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Apr 9, 2024

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 542b34c

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 8 packages
Name Type
rrweb Patch
rrweb-snapshot Patch
rrdom Patch
rrdom-nodejs Patch
rrweb-player Patch
@rrweb/types Patch
@rrweb/web-extension Patch
rrvideo Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@eoghanmurray
Copy link
Contributor Author

427acff removed the timestamp from the 'event' type and added the 'eventWithTime' .
with this change, 'event' is now called 'eventWithoutTime'

in future I'm also thinking of renaming eventWithTime to just event (or rrEvent)

@eoghanmurray eoghanmurray merged commit ae6908d into rrweb-io:master Apr 19, 2024
6 checks passed
billyvg pushed a commit to getsentry/rrweb that referenced this pull request Apr 19, 2024
…sion (rrweb-io#1441)

performance: remove a nested function call and an object clone during event emission

 - rename `event` to `eventWithoutTime`, but maintain backwards compatibility
 - `eventWithTime` (with time) could be renamed to `event` in a future version

This is an extension of PR rrweb-io#1339 authored by: mydea <[email protected]>
billyvg pushed a commit to getsentry/rrweb that referenced this pull request Apr 19, 2024
…sion (rrweb-io#1441)

performance: remove a nested function call and an object clone during event emission

 - rename `event` to `eventWithoutTime`, but maintain backwards compatibility
 - `eventWithTime` (with time) could be renamed to `event` in a future version

This is an extension of PR rrweb-io#1339 authored by: mydea <[email protected]>
billyvg pushed a commit to getsentry/rrweb that referenced this pull request Apr 19, 2024
…sion (rrweb-io#1441)

performance: remove a nested function call and an object clone during event emission

 - rename `event` to `eventWithoutTime`, but maintain backwards compatibility
 - `eventWithTime` (with time) could be renamed to `event` in a future version

This is an extension of PR rrweb-io#1339 authored by: mydea <[email protected]>
jaj1014 pushed a commit to pendo-io/rrweb that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2024
…sion (rrweb-io#1441)

performance: remove a nested function call and an object clone during event emission

 - rename `event` to `eventWithoutTime`, but maintain backwards compatibility
 - `eventWithTime` (with time) could be renamed to `event` in a future version

This is an extension of PR rrweb-io#1339 authored by: mydea <[email protected]>
jxiwang pushed a commit to amplitude/rrweb that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2024
…sion (rrweb-io#1441)

performance: remove a nested function call and an object clone during event emission

 - rename `event` to `eventWithoutTime`, but maintain backwards compatibility
 - `eventWithTime` (with time) could be renamed to `event` in a future version

This is an extension of PR rrweb-io#1339 authored by: mydea <[email protected]>
jxiwang pushed a commit to amplitude/rrweb that referenced this pull request Oct 16, 2024
…sion (rrweb-io#1441)

performance: remove a nested function call and an object clone during event emission

 - rename `event` to `eventWithoutTime`, but maintain backwards compatibility
 - `eventWithTime` (with time) could be renamed to `event` in a future version

This is an extension of PR rrweb-io#1339 authored by: mydea <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants