Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Possibility to use TwistStamped (still Twist by default) #54

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 21, 2021

Conversation

klintan
Copy link
Contributor

@klintan klintan commented Aug 22, 2020

Ros2_control decided to go for TwistStamped (which I can understand because of the extra info + timestamp you get) however that makes it incompatible with this library. This is a suggested fix for that, if you feel this is an option, i'll go ahead and change the other modules (joy and mouse) the same way.

Let me know what you think :)

PS. would be good to create a foxy-devel branch as well.

@bmagyar bmagyar changed the base branch from eloquent-devel to foxy-devel November 3, 2020 06:51
Copy link
Member

@bmagyar bmagyar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The changes look good in general, please rebase to latest master & have a look at my comments.

@klintan
Copy link
Contributor Author

klintan commented Dec 8, 2020

The changes look good in general, please rebase to latest master & have a look at my comments.

Sorry for the slow response on this one. It should all be addressed now as far as the feedback goes.

edit: let me know if there is anything else :)

@Rayman
Copy link

Rayman commented Jan 29, 2021

This PR references ros-navigation/navigation2#1594. See also the discussion there.

@bmagyar bmagyar merged commit 7ec6ce3 into ros-teleop:foxy-devel Mar 21, 2021
@Rayman
Copy link

Rayman commented Mar 21, 2021

@bmagyar this PR breaks compatibility right? So you might only want this PR for galactic

Whoops, I didn't read that this would add an option for twist stamped

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants