Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

removed linear kinematic params from RPP Readme #2930

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 29, 2022
Merged

removed linear kinematic params from RPP Readme #2930

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 29, 2022

Conversation

relffok
Copy link
Contributor

@relffok relffok commented Apr 29, 2022

Minor fix of RPP README that was accidentally forgot in #2631 and left me with confusion.

@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Apr 29, 2022

@relffok, please properly fill in PR template in the future. @SteveMacenski, use this instead.

  • Check that any new parameters added are updated in navigation.ros.org
  • Check that any significant change is added to the migration guide
  • Check that any new features OR changes to existing behaviors are reflected in the tuning guide
  • Check that any new functions have Doxygen added
  • Check that any new features have test coverage
  • Check that any new plugins is added to the plugins page
  • If BT Node, Additionally: add to BT's XML index of nodes for groot, BT package's readme table, and BT library lists

@SteveMacenski SteveMacenski merged commit f5dfc37 into ros-navigation:main Apr 29, 2022
redvinaa pushed a commit to EnjoyRobotics/navigation2 that referenced this pull request Jun 30, 2022
@relffok @redvinaa
removed linear kinematic params from RPP Readme (ros-navigation#2930)
490fee2
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@SteveMacenski SteveMacenski SteveMacenski approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@relffok @SteveMacenski