Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make long read qc temp #132

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 8, 2023
Merged

Make long read qc temp #132

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 8, 2023

Conversation

rhysnewell
Copy link
Owner

The cost to storage is not worth having an extra copy of your nanopore reads sitting around just to save time during the QC stage. If users are unaware that they can delete this file then we'll quickly be filling up peoples servers with junk.

@rhysnewell rhysnewell requested review from wwood and AroneyS September 7, 2023 23:44
@rhysnewell rhysnewell closed this Sep 7, 2023
@rhysnewell rhysnewell reopened this Sep 7, 2023
@rhysnewell rhysnewell changed the base branch from main to dev September 7, 2023 23:46
@AroneyS
Copy link
Collaborator

AroneyS commented Sep 8, 2023

There was an issue with using temp for the bam files right? What was that again?

@rhysnewell
Copy link
Owner Author

I can't exactly remember but I think they were just getting deleted prematurely if the pipeline crashed, or they aren't picked up as a requirement correctly for certain rules so they would get deleted early. They currently just get cleaned up at the end of the pipeline but the final binning rule

@rhysnewell rhysnewell merged commit 0826558 into dev Sep 8, 2023
@rhysnewell rhysnewell deleted the make_long_read_qc_temp branch September 8, 2023 04:55
@AroneyS AroneyS mentioned this pull request Sep 13, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants