-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 986
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rename master branch to main #1308
Comments
Where possible, we replace master with upstream and slave with replica such as blacklist of nodes with rejection of nodes to preserve their expressiveness.
Very late to the party, but I happened to see the "Upstream", AFAIK, is not a word that is being actively used in Redis terminology (please correct me if I'm wrong!), so us using it feels like it does more harm than good. (More upstream Redis discussion can be found in this issue: redis/redis#5335, as well as @antirez blog post from a couple of years ago: http://antirez.com/news/122) TL;DR: As far as I understand it, Redis uses the "master-replication" terminology. I think we are doing ourselves and the community harm if we deviate from this terminology, it just confusing. If you think this terminology is wrong/bad, I think we should try to get Redis to stop using it as well. |
Thanks for chiming in @perlun. We were a bit more progressive on the client side and not fully sure how using |
Thanks for listening, appreciated. 👍 I filed #1518 about this now, let's move the discussion there. |
Until recently, I haven’t fully considered the racist connotations of terms like whitelist and blacklist and master. While we had efforts a while ago (#845), we want to reduce wording that is connotated with oppressive (racist) language hence we should revisit branch names and documentation for wording improvements.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: