Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Are there any plans to support Open API 3.0.0? #2

Closed
imposibrus opened this issue Jan 4, 2018 · 4 comments
Closed

Are there any plans to support Open API 3.0.0? #2

imposibrus opened this issue Jan 4, 2018 · 4 comments

Comments

@imposibrus
Copy link

Link issue in readmeio/swagger-inline#8

@dwasyluk
Copy link

Any updates on this?

@gkoberger
Copy link
Contributor

Yes! We were waiting on the package swagger-parser to support it, however we'll be switching to wework/speccy instead. We hope to have it out soon!

@gkoberger
Copy link
Contributor

Support for 3.0 is now live! Post an issue if you run into any bugs :)

@gkoberger
Copy link
Contributor

There were some issues with shorthand parameters not supporting OAS 3.0, however that's fixed now!

We now have a full site describing how to use oas: http://openap.is/

erunion pushed a commit that referenced this issue May 9, 2024
## 🧰 Changes

Fixes a few minuscule bugs with this `exampleGroups` object generation:
- [x] We were previously adding names to nameless code samples
regardless of their language (e.g., `Default #1` could be `shell` and
the next nameless sample would be `Default #2` regardless of it was
`shell` or not). We now properly split out our nameless sample counts by
language
- [x] We weren't properly tacking on these names to the code sample
objects themselves
- [x] Upgrades `oas-examples` to the latest

This `exampleGroups` object has some wonky ergonomics that I'm already
reckoning with but I can't seem to think of an alternative approach that
warrants a breaking change. Stay tuned I guess?

## 🧬 QA & Testing

Do tests still pass?
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants