Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Removed testing against HHVM nightly #66

Merged

Conversation

WyriHaximus
Copy link
Member

@WyriHaximus WyriHaximus commented Sep 3, 2016

HHVM is broken on travis for a while now.

@WyriHaximus
Copy link
Member Author

@clue @jsor 👍 or 👎 ?

@jsor
Copy link
Member

jsor commented Sep 9, 2016

👍

@clue
Copy link
Member

clue commented Sep 9, 2016

Perhaps I'm missing something, but what is the point in adding PHP 7.1 here? Afaict there are no BC breaks and nothing we take advantage of in particular, so should we really keep adding new versions to our ever growing test matrix? Also, what about our other components?

👍 on dropping unsupported/broken hhvm-nightly builds
+-0 on adding PHP 7.1 support

@WyriHaximus
Copy link
Member Author

Right the addition of 7.1 is a force of habit of always testing against all supported versions. I'm +-0 on it to be honest so if anyone insists on not testing against it that is fine by me since we also test against 7.0.

@WyriHaximus WyriHaximus changed the title Test against PHP 7.1 and not against HHVM nightly anymore Removed testing against HHVM nightly Sep 14, 2016
@WyriHaximus WyriHaximus merged commit 1fa41f8 into master Nov 30, 2016
@WyriHaximus WyriHaximus deleted the ci-travis-test-against-7.1-and-no-more-hhvm-nightly branch November 30, 2016 18:03
@WyriHaximus WyriHaximus added this to the v0.4.3 milestone Feb 10, 2017
WyriHaximus added a commit to WyriHaximus/http that referenced this pull request May 31, 2017
* Test against PHP 7.1 and not against HHVM nightly anymore

* Removed 7.1 to not overly bloat the test matrix

* Changed 7.0 back to 7 so the effective changes are only what the PR is about now
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants