Add colocalization measures

[grlee77]

This MR impelements four colocaliziation measures being introduced for scikit-image 0.20. The implementation of each is fairly simple. For reference, see a related gallery example.

Benchmark results vs. scikit-image 0.20dev

Benchmark results show speedup in all cases below aside from intersection_coeff on small images.

function	shape	dtype	acceleration
manders_coloc_coeff	(512, 512)	float32	1.72
manders_coloc_coeff	(512, 512)	uint8	2.93
manders_coloc_coeff	(3840, 2160)	float32	39.3
manders_coloc_coeff	(3840, 2160)	uint8	49.9
manders_coloc_coeff	(192,192,192)	float32	38.1
manders_coloc_coeff	(192,192,192)	uint8	47.4

function	shape	dtype	acceleration
manders_overlap_coeff	(512, 512)	float32	1.41
manders_overlap_coeff	(512, 512)	uint8	1.48
manders_overlap_coeff	(3840, 2160)	float32	2.33
manders_overlap_coeff	(3840, 2160)	uint8	2.93
manders_overlap_coeff	(192,192,192)	float32	2.31
manders_overlap_coeff	(192,192,192)	uint8	2.80

function	shape	dtype	acceleration
pearson_corr_coeff	(512, 512)	float32	6.96
pearson_corr_coeff	(512, 512)	uint8	8.10
pearson_corr_coeff	(3840, 2160)	float32	49.5
pearson_corr_coeff	(3840, 2160)	uint8	53.4
pearson_corr_coeff	(192,192,192)	float32	51.6
pearson_corr_coeff	(192,192,192)	uint8	52.5

function	shape	dtype	acceleration
intersection_coeff	(512, 512)	bool	0.278
intersection_coeff	(3840, 2160)	bool	13.1
intersection_coeff	(192,192,192)	bool	11.1

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Base: 92.95% // Head: 92.88% // Decreases project coverage by -0.07% ⚠️

Coverage data is based on head (1fa1633) compared to base (a8d9690).
Patch coverage: 88.74% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files

@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##           branch-23.02     #488      +/-   ##
================================================
- Coverage         92.95%   92.88%   -0.07%     
================================================
  Files               130      131       +1     
  Lines              9775     9890     +115     
================================================
+ Hits               9086     9186     +100     
- Misses              689      704      +15     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
python/cucim/src/cucim/skimage/color/colorconv.py	97.97% <ø> (ø)
...on/cucim/src/cucim/skimage/filters/_median_hist.py	81.31% <81.81%> (-0.31%)	⬇️
...cucim/src/cucim/skimage/measure/_colocalization.py	86.20% <86.20%> (ø)
...m/skimage/registration/_phase_cross_correlation.py	94.82% <91.48%> (-1.69%)	⬇️
python/cucim/src/cucim/skimage/filters/_median.py	81.96% <91.66%> (+0.48%)	⬆️
python/cucim/src/cucim/skimage/_shared/utils.py	77.40% <100.00%> (+0.58%)	⬆️
python/cucim/src/cucim/skimage/measure/__init__.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[gigony]

intersection_coeff (512, 512) bool 0.278

I wonder if this result is okay and if you have an idea on what caused the performance degradation.

[gigony]

Thanks @grlee77 ! It looks good to me! (with a minor typo that can be addressed later).

[grlee77]

/merge