Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[1.3.z] Use Kafka 3.5 as AMQ operator does not support 3.6 #956

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 23, 2023
Merged

[1.3.z] Use Kafka 3.5 as AMQ operator does not support 3.6 #956

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 23, 2023

Conversation

michalvavrik
Copy link
Member

Summary

backports #937

Please check the relevant options

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Dependency update
  • Refactoring
  • Backport
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • This change requires a documentation update
  • This change requires execution against OCP (use run tests phrase in comment)

Checklist:

  • Example scenarios has been updated / added
  • Methods and classes used in PR scenarios are meaningful
  • Commits are well encapsulated and follow the best practices

@michalvavrik
Copy link
Member Author

run tests

@michalvavrik michalvavrik changed the title Use Kafka 3.5 as AMQ operator does not support 3.6 [1.3.z] Use Kafka 3.5 as AMQ operator does not support 3.6 Nov 22, 2023
mjurc
mjurc approved these changes Nov 23, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@mjurc mjurc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@mjurc mjurc merged commit 415c0a7 into quarkus-qe:1.3.z Nov 23, 2023
4 of 9 checks passed
@michalvavrik michalvavrik deleted the backports/1.3.z-kafka-operator-3-5 branch November 23, 2023 20:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@mjurc mjurc mjurc approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@michalvavrik @mjurc