Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make _create_transformer_with_kwargs a public method #5492
Make _create_transformer_with_kwargs a public method #5492
Changes from 1 commit
041e974
fa0198a
fe339bc
cedfc1a
42abd79
aca24bf
021ec10
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why do we need the type ignore? I guess it's because
cirq.TRANSFORMER
is a callable protocol whose__call__
signature does not allow for extra kwargs. Might we be able to remove the type ignore by extending the signature with explicit kwargs?In any case, there should be a comment explaining the reason for the ignore and linking to a mypy issue if there is one open.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, that's right.
This is not possible because function arguments are contravariant, so adding
**kwargs
to the signature of the protocol would mean that every transformer would need to support a**kwargs : Any
; which is bad.Added a comment.