Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Backport master's README.rst to 3.6 #86

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 15, 2017
Merged

Backport master's README.rst to 3.6 #86

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 15, 2017

Conversation

zware
Copy link
Member

@zware zware commented Feb 14, 2017

Includes GH-2, GH-70, GH-73, and GH-21.

@Mariatta
Copy link
Member

GH-73 has already been cherry-picked in GH-79 :)

Copy link
Member

@brettcannon brettcannon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Quick glance of the rendered output LGTM.

@brettcannon
Copy link
Member

So should this be merged in spite of GH-79?

@zware
Copy link
Member Author

zware commented Feb 15, 2017

This change contains GH-79, and git recorded this change as a delete README and add README.rst, so there's no conflict. I'll go ahead and merge.

@zware zware merged commit 1e8cc88 into python:3.6 Feb 15, 2017
@zware zware deleted the 3.6 branch February 15, 2017 19:29
@zware zware restored the 3.6 branch February 15, 2017 19:30
akruis pushed a commit to akruis/cpython that referenced this pull request Sep 9, 2017
Reimplement Stackless/unittests/support.py. The new implementation
is more IDE friendly and requires only a single pass to run all
test with and without soft switching.

Base all tests on StacklessTestCase.
Remove a second call of unittest.main from ```if __name__ ==
"__main__"```-blocks

https://bitbucket.org/stackless-dev/stackless/issues/86
(grafted from 8237bba0d27ab1bdd2cdbfa52c7bdb6f468119a7, 719923b5c638,
06295530c672, 65cff13662f2)
colesbury referenced this pull request in colesbury/nogil Oct 6, 2021
See #86

This does not fix races where the _localimpl is delete by another
thread... but I don't think the _threading_local implementation
is actually used.
jaraco pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 2, 2022
jaraco added a commit to jaraco/cpython that referenced this pull request Feb 17, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants